U.S. vetoes verification
In: Bulletin of the atomic scientists, Band 58, Heft 2, S. 24-26
ISSN: 1938-3282
99 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Bulletin of the atomic scientists, Band 58, Heft 2, S. 24-26
ISSN: 1938-3282
In: The bulletin of the atomic scientists: a magazine of science and public affairs, Band 58, Heft 2, S. 17-26
ISSN: 0096-3402, 0096-5243, 0742-3829
In: Democratizing Global Governance, S. 198-211
In: Le monde diplomatique, Band 48, Heft 572, S. 3
ISSN: 0026-9395, 1147-2766
In: Dissent: a journal devoted to radical ideas and the values of socialism and democracy, Band 48, Heft 1, S. 62-69
ISSN: 0012-3846
In: Dissent: a journal devoted to radical ideas and the values of socialism and democracy, S. 62-69
ISSN: 0012-3846
Describes Feb. 1975 international scientific conference held at Asilomar Conference Center in California, during which molecular biologists discussed benefits and potential hazards for society of the then-new field, sought public support, and proposed restrictions on research in exchange for self-regulation. Argues that the Asilomar scientists were motivated by self-interest rather than concern for society and that they failed to use their prestige and authority to address key social issues.
In: Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Band 55, Heft 3, S. 23-25
In: Bulletin of the atomic scientists, Band 55, Heft 3, S. 23-25
ISSN: 1938-3282
In: The bulletin of the atomic scientists: a magazine of science and public affairs, Band 55, Heft 3, S. 23-25
ISSN: 0096-3402, 0096-5243, 0742-3829
In: The bulletin of the atomic scientists: a magazine of science and public affairs, Band 55, Heft 3, S. 23
ISSN: 0096-3402, 0096-5243, 0742-3829
In: International journal of cultural policy: CP, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 173-182
ISSN: 1477-2833
In: Bulletin of the atomic scientists, Band 53, Heft 6, S. 18-19
ISSN: 1938-3282
In: Politics and the life sciences: PLS ; a journal of political behavior, ethics, and policy, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 299-303
ISSN: 1471-5457
In: Politics and the life sciences: PLS, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 299-303
ISSN: 0730-9384
In: Politics and the life sciences: PLS ; a journal of political behavior, ethics, and policy, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 249-263
ISSN: 1471-5457
Launched during the heydays of the copying machine and the U.S. sunshine laws and surrounded by controversy from its inception, genetic engineering may be the best documented technology ever to emerge from a laboratory. This essay draws on the pages that flowed forth from formal policy arenas as well as from less accessible places to examine the rise and fall of genetic engineering controls in the United States and Britain. The general argument developed here is that the settling of the issues raised by this field was achieved not through the resolution of technical problems but rather through the exertion of social interests—notably those of national governments, transnational corporations, genetic engineering firms, scientists, and sectors of the public. A synthesis of methods of analysis drawn from critiques of pluralism and from Foucault's analysis of the relation between power and discursive practice is used to assess the relative effects of these interests.