Book chapter(electronic)#162011
Global Egalitarianism
In: Global Justice and Avant-Garde Political Agency, p. 88-105
Search results
Filter
2609 results
Sort by:
Book chapter(electronic)#172007
Global Egalitarianism
In: National Responsibility and Global Justice, p. 51-80
Book chapter(electronic)#181983
Specific Egalitarianism
In: Political Theory and Social Policy, p. 100-121
Book chapter(electronic)#19
Luck Egalitarianism
In: The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy
Article(electronic)#20October 1, 1979
Family Egalitarianism in Cultural Contexts: High-Variation Japanese Egalitarianism vs. Low-Variation American Egalitarianism
In: Journal of comparative family studies, Volume 10, Issue 3, p. 315-329
ISSN: 1929-9850
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(electronic)#21January 2008
Reassessing Luck Egalitarianism
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Volume 70, Issue 1, p. 136-150
ISSN: 1468-2508
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(electronic)#22May 1, 2006
Binmore's Egalitarianism
In: Analyse & Kritik: journal of philosophy and social theory, Volume 28, Issue 1, p. 89-94
ISSN: 2365-9858
Abstract
In this short commentary on Ken Binmore's Natural Justice I primarily examine the relationship between mainstream egalitarian theories and Binmore's approach. I argue that Binmore uses key concepts in non-standard ways. As a result, he doesn't engage enough with the views he criticises.
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Book chapter(electronic)#23
Illuminating Egalitarianism*
In: Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy, p. 153-178
Article(electronic)#242008
Political Egalitarianism
In: Social theory and practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy, Volume 34, Issue 4, p. 485-516
ISSN: 2154-123X
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(print)#251988
Autonomy and Egalitarianism
In: Political studies, Volume 36, Issue 4, p. 663
ISSN: 0032-3217
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(print)#261992
Is Egalitarianism Dead?
In: Dissent: a journal devoted to radical ideas and the values of socialism and democracy, Volume 39, Issue 4, p. 470
ISSN: 0012-3846
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Article(print)#271988
Autonomy and egalitarianism
In: Political studies, Volume 36, Issue Dec 88
ISSN: 0032-3217
Considers the alleged incompatibility between individual autonomy and the achievement and subsequent maintenance of an egalitarian society. Argues that it is only where an egalitarian society is in place that a like autonomy can be exercised by each citizen. Discusses the 3 main grounds that have been advanced to show there is such an incompatibility. (Abstract amended)
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
SSRN
Working paper
Article(electronic)#29November 11, 2021
Experiments and egalitarianism
In: Behavioural public policy: BPP, Volume 8, Issue 2, p. 403-408
ISSN: 2398-0648
AbstractIn this paper, I reflect on the implications that ultimatum and dictator game experiments might have for public policy and for the debates over egalitarianism. Experiments suggest that people are more inclined to redistribute when outcomes are influenced by luck than effort. This can create difficulties for public policy when people hold contrasting views over whether luck or effort determine outcomes. The results also appear to play into forms of luck egalitarianism. However, they may also be consistent with an alternative understanding of egalitarianism as the impulse to have rules that treat people equally.
Checking availability at your location
This article is also available at your library: |
electronic
print
Open Access#302021
Greening Global Egalitarianism?
In Justice and Natural Resources: An Egalitarian Theory (2017), Chris Armstrong proposes a version of global egalitarianism that – contra the default renderings of this approach – takes individual attachment to specific resources into account. By doing this, his theory has the potential for greening global egalitarianism both in terms of procedure and scope. In terms of procedure, its broad account of attachment and its focus on individuals rather than groups connects with participatory governance and management and, ultimately, participatory democracy – an essential ingredient in the toolkit of green politics and policy-making. In terms of scope, because it does not commit itself to any particular moral framework, Armstrong's theory leaves the door open for non-human animals to become subjects of justice, thus extending the realm of the latter beyond its traditionally anthropocentric borders. I conclude that these greenings are promising, but not trouble-free.
BASE