Capital movements and external financing
In: CEPAL review, Heft 55, S. 81-94
ISSN: 0251-2920
545240 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: CEPAL review, Heft 55, S. 81-94
ISSN: 0251-2920
World Affairs Online
In: A World Bank country study
In: CEPAL review, Band 1995, Heft 55, S. 81-94
ISSN: 1684-0348
In: Economic Development and Cultural Change, Band 37, Heft 3, S. 535-556
ISSN: 1539-2988
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
In: The journal of financial research: the journal of the Southern Finance Association and the Southwestern Finance Association, Band 18, Heft 2, S. 207-222
ISSN: 1475-6803
AbstractUsing a large panel of industrial Compustat firms from 1971 to 1988, we find long‐term external financing to be positively related to the period's capital expenditures on growth opportunities, but negatively related to beginning‐of‐the‐period financial slack, broadly defined. These findings support the view that firms tend to match long‐term sources of financing with long‐lived assets, and short‐term debt with short‐lived assets. Our results also reinforce the belief that firms prefer internal to external financing. We find no evidence that firms favor financing capital expenditures with short‐term debt, either permanently or temporarily.
In: Journal of Intellectual Capital, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 216-235
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to first examine whether intellectual capital (IC) information is considered in firm valuation. Next, to examine two issues: financial analysts' investment recommendations when faced with different combinations of performance levels (i.e. above or below industry average) of financial and IC measures, and the role of financial and IC measures with different performance levels and holding periods (i.e. short‐term vs long‐term) for the investment on analysts' recommendations.Design/methodology/approachThe first part of the paper used secondary (both archival and survey) data. The second part was an experiment.FindingsThe findings in the first part show that, after controlling for the effect of financial performances on firm value, measures of IC are still significant explanatory variables (of firm value). The second part shows that the financial and IC measures affect financial analysts' investment recommendations differently depending on the measures' levels of performance and the time horizon for holding the investments.Research limitations/implicationsThe limitations of the paper are as follows: the use of secondary data from a single country limits its generalizability; and the results of the experiment are parameterized by the research design such as the amount of information provided to the financial analysts. Extending the analyses to other settings and using time‐series data represent future research opportunities.Originality/valueThe research makes three contributions to the IC literature. First, it extends the studies on the relevance of IC in capital market research by broadening its scope to include measures of IC other than R&D intensity. Next, it provides evidence of the informativeness of IC measures in market valuation of firms and analysts' recommendations, thus lending credence to the arguments of reports and researchers for more external communication of IC information. Finally, this study is one of the first to examine a broader scope of IC in the capital market context and the use of IC by sophisticated market participants. With policy‐makers and standard‐setting bodies considering proposals to enhance information on IC in financial reports, it is important to broaden the scope of IC metrics and understand their role in enhancing firm value to develop a framework for reporting IC.
In: Public choice, Band 117, Heft 3-4, S. 357-372
ISSN: 0048-5829
Theory suggests that capital is more likely to be efficiently allocated via market mechanisms, such as bank lending & stock issuance, than via nonmarket allocation. Consequently, we conjecture that increased market allocation of capital will enhance economic growth. We also posit that good collateral & corporate law will increase the allocation of capital via debt & equity markets, respectively. Using measures of statutory law as instruments for market-mobilized capital, to control for its endogeneity in a cross-country growth regression, we demonstrate a clear causal link between financial market development & economic performance. 4 Tables, 21 References. Adapted from the source document.
In: IMF Working Papers
Capital markets in the East African Community (EAC) face common challenges of low capitalization and liquidity, but to different degrees. EAC member countries have made noticeable progress in developing domestic capital markets through a regional approach, removing constraints on capital transactions and harmonizing market infrastructure. Nevertheless, empirical analysis suggests capital market integration has not deepened during the past few years in the EAC, although convergence of investment returns is taking place to some extent. Learning from the experience of the West African Economic an
In: The Single market review
In: Subseries 3, Dismantling of barriers 5
In: Journal of Corporate Finance, Band 37
SSRN