Sustainability Indicators for Cities
In: Sustainability and Cities, p. 53-79
2674001 results
Sort by:
In: Sustainability and Cities, p. 53-79
In: Parliamentary journal, Volume 41, Issue 4, p. 157-159
ISSN: 0048-2994
The Sustainable Development Commission made the following proposal to the Department for Education and Skills and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs concerning the indicator of education for sustainable development announced in the UK Government strategy 'Securing the Future'. ; Publisher PDF
BASE
In: Social work: a journal of the National Association of Social Workers
ISSN: 1545-6846
In: The Canadian Journal of Economics, Volume 29, p. S490
In: Water and environment journal, Volume 19, Issue 2, p. 115-124
ISSN: 1747-6593
In: The Bangladesh development studies: the journal of the Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies, Volume 9, Issue 2, p. 103-111
ISSN: 0304-095X
The paper discusses distributional value judgements in terms of welfare weights and the welfare weight in terms of the elasticity of the marginal valuation or utility of income. Vital role of distributional considerations in any public policy formulation. Income tax structure and marginal tax rate in Bangladesh in 1976. Income and price response to rice consumption
World Affairs Online
In: The journal of business, Volume 33, Issue 4, p. 373
ISSN: 1537-5374
In light of the globally increasing prevalence of diet-related chronic diseases, new scalable and non-invasive dietary monitoring techniques are urgently needed. Automatically collected digital receipts from loyalty cards hereby promise to serve as an objective and automatically traceable digital marker for individual food choice behavior and do not require users to manually log individual meal items. With the introduction of the General Data Privacy Regulation in the European Union, millions of consumers gained the right to access their shopping data in a machine-readable form, representing a historic chance to leverage shopping data for scalable monitoring of food choices. Multiple quantitative indicators for evaluating the nutritional quality of food shopping have been suggested, but so far, no comparison has validated the potential of these alternative indicators within a comparative setting. This manuscript thus represents the first study to compare the calibration capacity and to validate the discrimination potential of previously suggested food shopping quality indicators for the nutritional quality of shopped groceries, including the Food Standards Agency Nutrient Profiling System Dietary Index (FSA-NPS DI), Grocery Purchase Quality Index-2016 (GPQI), Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015), Healthy Trolley Index (HETI) and Healthy Purchase Index (HPI), checking if any of them performs differently from the others. The hypothesis is that some food shopping quality indicators outperform the others in calibrating and discriminating individual actual dietary intake. To assess the indicators' potentials, 89 eligible participants completed a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and donated their digital receipts from the loyalty card programs of the two leading Swiss grocery retailers, which represent 70% of the national grocery market. Compared to absolute food and nutrient intake, correlations between density-based relative food and nutrient intake and food shopping data are stronger. The FSA-NPS DI has the best calibration and discrimination performance in classifying participants' consumption of nutrients and food groups, and seems to be a superior indicator to estimate nutritional quality of a user's diet based on digital receipts from grocery shopping in Switzerland.
BASE
In light of the globally increasing prevalence of diet-related chronic diseases, new scalable and non-invasive dietary monitoring techniques are urgently needed. Automatically collected digital receipts from loyalty cards hereby promise to serve as an objective and automatically traceable digital marker for individual food choice behavior and do not require users to manually log individual meal items. With the introduction of the General Data Privacy Regulation in the European Union, millions of consumers gained the right to access their shopping data in a machine-readable form, representing a historic chance to leverage shopping data for scalable monitoring of food choices. Multiple quantitative indicators for evaluating the nutritional quality of food shopping have been suggested, but so far, no comparison has validated the potential of these alternative indicators within a comparative setting. This manuscript thus represents the first study to compare the calibration capacity and to validate the discrimination potential of previously suggested food shopping quality indicators for the nutritional quality of shopped groceries, including the Food Standards Agency Nutrient Profiling System Dietary Index (FSA-NPS DI), Grocery Purchase Quality Index-2016 (GPQI), Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015), Healthy Trolley Index (HETI) and Healthy Purchase Index (HPI), checking if any of them performs differently from the others. The hypothesis is that some food shopping quality indicators outperform the others in calibrating and discriminating individual actual dietary intake. To assess the indicators' potentials, 89 eligible participants completed a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and donated their digital receipts from the loyalty card programs of the two leading Swiss grocery retailers, which represent 70% of the national grocery market. Compared to absolute food and nutrient intake, correlations between density-based relative food and nutrient intake and food shopping data are stronger. The FSA-NPS DI has ...
BASE
In: International social science journal: ISSJ, Volume 29, Issue 3, p. 433-463
ISSN: 0020-8701
The search for health indicators is based on a logical desire to provide the best health care, distribution, & social planning by determining the health condition of a population. Indicators would allow for a historical assessment, monitoring of a present trend, & planning for the future. However, a clear-cut definition of each particular indicator is problematic. Each indicator may vary with individuals & institutions. Health is largely subjective; this makes objective analysis difficult & interpretive. Further complications arise from who is best equipped to provide the data, how descriptions are to be translated into indicators, how to compose an effective indicator scale for a state of health, & the search for a singular method or solution to solve the problem. 2 Tables, 5 Figures. A. Rothman.
SSRN
World Affairs Online