Suchergebnisse

Part I: Introduction -- 1. Sleep and Social Processes -- Part II: Circadian Rhythms -- 2. Daily Rhythmicity in Social Activity -- 3. Chronotype and Social behavior -- Part III: Cognition, Motivation, and Emotion -- 4. Sleep in Social Cognition and Judgment -- 5. Sleep's Role in Effortful Performance and Sociability -- 6. How Sleep Shapes Emotion Regulation -- 7. Dynamics between Sleep and Self-Control -- Part IV: Dyads, Groups, and Organizations -- 8. Sleep and Social Impressions -- 9. Sleep in the Context of Close Relationships -- 10. Sleep and Social Behavior in Organizations: Implications for Task Performance -- Part IV: Personality -- 11. Sleep and Temperament in Early Childhood -- 12. Personality processes and sleep: An overview and a leitmotif for a research agenda -- 13. Personality Disorders, Maladaptive Personality Traits, and Sleep Problems: Findings and Future Directions.

Editor's note This well circulated but heretofore unpublished report is the summary statement of an interdisciplinary meeting of scholars convened by the National Science Foundation in Arlington, Virginia on June 28, 2010. The workshop, which was funded by the NSF's Political Science Program (Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences Grant #1037831), was convened to answer two compelling questions: Are studies of social behavior that build from discoveries about genes and/or cognition of greater social and scientific value than studies of the same topics that ignore such factors? And, how can fundable research on genes, cognition, and politics generate transformative scientific practices, infrastructure, and findings of high social value? Assembled for the workshop were a group of scholars representing diverse yet increasingly connected research areas, including genetics, cognitive science and neuroscience, decision making and risk analysis, economics, political science, and sociology. The resulting report outlines the substantial challenges facing interdisciplinary research but also describes the considerable contributions to knowledge that could result from sustained collaborations between biologists, geneticists, and brain scientists on the one hand and social scientists on the other. Following this main report are three white papers by Jeremy Freese. Elizabeth Hammock, and Rose McDermott, which address importmant considerations related to the discussion. For a download of the full report, see http://www.isr.umich.edu.cps/workshop.Welcome.html.