Suchergebnisse

Chen-Ning Yang's tribute to Lee Kuan Yew -- Singapore : what we have overlooked and misinterpreted / Cai Dingjian -- A hardworking, unflagging student : remembering our founding father, Lee Kuan Yew / Chua Chee Lay -- Lee Kuan Yew and Singapore / Chen Kang -- A review of the Singapore story / Du Ping -- Amartya Sen deconstructs Lee Kuan Yew's "Asian values" / He Aiguo -- Lee Kuan Yew and his Singapore / Lam Hang Chi -- Lee Kuan Yew's thoughts on talent and Singapore's development strategy / Liu Hong and Zhang Huimei -- Lee Kuan Yew, a man of the century / Lawrence J. Lau -- Lee Kuan Yew's passing marks the real beginning of the post-Lee Kuan Yew era / Lü Yuanli -- Lee Kuan Yew : history, heritage and the idea of Singapore / Wang Gungwu -- A final gift / Su Guaning -- Lee Kuan Yew's political theories / Yu Yingshi -- Lee Kuan Yew's pragmatism / Zhang Jun -- Lee Kuan Yew and the politics of the post-colonial world / Zheng Yongnian -- Lee Kuan Yew and the teaching of Chinese / Chew Cheng Hai

Kinchin, I orcid:0000-0003-0133-2763; Mccalman, JR orcid:0000-0002-3022-3980 ; © 2019 Researchers worldwide are increasingly reporting the societal impact of their research as part of national research productivity assessments. However, the challenges they encounter in developing their impact case studies against specified government assessment criteria and how pitfalls can be mitigated are not reported. This paper examines the key steps taken to develop an Aboriginal Family Wellbeing (FWB) empowerment research impact case study in the context of an Australian Research Council (ARC) pilot research impact assessment exercise and the challenges involved in applying the ARC criteria. The requirement that researchers demonstrate how their institutions support them to conduct impactful research has the potential to create supportive environments for researchers to be more responsive to the needs of users outside academia. However, the 15-year reference period for the associated research underpinning the reported impact and the focus on researcher's current institutional affiliation constitute potential constraints to demonstrating the true impact of research. For researchers working with Indigenous people, relationships that build over long periods of time, irrespective of university affiliation, are critical to conducting impactful research. A more open-ended time-frame, with no institutional restrictions for the 'associated research' provides the best opportunity to demonstrate the true benefits of research not only for Indigenous people but for Australian society more broadly. ; Associated Grant Code:1078927

Researchers worldwide are increasingly reporting the societal impact of their research as part of national research productivity assessments. However, the challenges they encounter in developing their impact case studies against specified government assessment criteria and how pitfalls can be mitigated are not reported. This paper examines the key steps taken to develop an Aboriginal Family Wellbeing (FWB) empowerment research impact case study in the context of an Australian Research Council (ARC) pilot research impact assessment exercise and the challenges involved in applying the ARC criteria. The requirement that researchers demonstrate how their institutions support them to conduct impactful research has the potential to create supportive environments for researchers to be more responsive to the needs of users outside academia. However, the 15-year reference period for the associated research underpinning the reported impact and the focus on researcher's current institutional affiliation constitute potential constraints to demonstrating the true impact of research. For researchers working with Indigenous people, relationships that build over long periods of time, irrespective of university affiliation, are critical to conducting impactful research. A more open-ended time-frame, with no institutional restrictions for the 'associated research' provides the best opportunity to demonstrate the true benefits of research not only for Indigenous people but for Australian society more broadly. ; This study was undertaken under the auspices of the Centre of Research Excellence: An Innovation Platform for Integrated Quality Improvement in Indigenous Primary Health Care (CRE-IQI, funded by the NHMRC ID 1078927). In addition, the authors would like to acknowledge funding support received by the Lowitja Institute, and in-kind support from James Cook University and the Cairns Institute.