Suchergebnisse

- ; Globalisation is shorthand for changes in space, time and the relationship between them. This paper, which will be forthcoming as a chapter in a book edited by Andrew Cooper and published by the United Nations University Press, argues that changes in deterritorialisation will not have thoroughgoing effects for diplomacy. A change in time, notably the change to zero lag-time in information flows, is, on the other hand, of key importance. So is the increase in the sheer mass and density of communication. If transcending boundaries is the essence of globalisation, then it stands to reason that state diplomats must sooner or later take cognizance of the other kinds of polities that exist within the system.

- ; Political communication comes in various forms. The first part of this paper presents some variants of political communication, and provides a set of definitions of such communication. A centre of gravity is along the borderline and overlap between rhetoric and propaganda. It is argued here that rhetoric unlike propaganda has a potential for deliberation. Propaganda is inherently hostile towards debate and discussion. This reluctance towards debate and discussion has at times been evident as regards the Bush administration's war on terrorism. The second part of the article deals with propaganda from the Bush administration aimed at quelling debate. All the principals from the first George W. Bush administration (2001-2005) took part in this strategy. Most of the material presented here is explained in more detail in Anders G. Romarheim (2005). "Crossfire of Fear: Propaganda in the US War on Terrorism" Hovedoppgave i Statsvitenskap, ISV, UIO.

- ; French foreign policy towards the US is often understood as particularly confrontational and based on traditional power politics, or a wish to re-establish "la grandeur de la France". This article aims at investigating the validity of this widely held view. It further seeks to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the French positions by studying the arguments used by the French political leadership and the implications of the Iraq conflict for bilateral cooperation at lower levels. This study questions the common assumption of IR theory that national identities and/or interests are fixed and independent of structural factors such as international norms and values. It also questions the value of focusing exclusively on diplomatic or "top-level" bilateral relations, without looking at "low-level" or practical bilateral cooperation and/or conflicts.

Schlußresolutionen der VI. Interparlamentarischen Konferenz über europäische Zusammenarbeit und Sicherheit in Bonn vom 26. bis zum 31. Mai 1986; Dokument der Konferenz über Vertrauens- und Sicherheitsbildende Maßnahmen und Abrüstung in Europa (KVAE) in Stockholm vom 19. September 1986

Relevant als Überblicksliteratur