Suchergebnisse

"Published by direction of the Government of the Federated Malay States." ; pt. 1. Wilkinson, R.J. Introductory sketch.-pt. 2. Rigby, J. The ninety-nine laws of Perak. ; Mode of access: Internet.

This law declares an energy crisis in the country due to high oil prices. It adopts measures in the hydrocarbon, electricity and transportation sectors in order to alleviate this crisis and to ensure the power supply to the general public. It declares a priority that the government seek international funding to invest in developing power generation projects using renewable energy. Lastly, it creates the Investment Fund for Energy Development and the Energy Crisis Fund.

Preliminary Material /Christopher Greenwood and L.H. McCormack -- Chapter 1. From Ove to Bring /Marie Jacobsson -- Chapter 2. The Writings of Ove Bring /Marie Jacobsson -- Chapter 3. Legal Restraints on the Use of Armed Force /Hans Blix -- Chapter 4. Individual Responsibility under National and International Law for the Conduct of Armed Conflict /Iain Cameron -- Chapter 5. Reflections on the Security Council and Its Mandate to Maintain International Peace and Security /Hans Corell -- Chapter 6. National Sovereignty and Responsibility for Spent Nuclear Fuel /Per Cramr -- Chapter 7. The Developing Relationship between Law and Politics in the United Nations Human Rights Council /Gudmundur Eiriksson -- Chapter 8. The Future of Human Rights Law in Peace Operations /Ola Engdahl -- Chapter 9. Sense and Sensibility in Sentencing - Taking Stock of International Criminal Punishment /Frederik Harhoff -- Chapter 10. Submarine Operations and International Law /Wolff Heintschel Von Heinegg -- Chapter 11. Occupation and Sovereignty - Still a Useful Distinction? /Martti Koskenniemi -- Chapter 12. The Second Lebanon War: Reflections on the 2006 Israeli Military Operations against Hezbollah /Said Mahmoudi -- Chapter 13. Cluster Munitions, Proportionality and the Foreseeability of Civilian Damage /Timothy L. H. McCormack and Paramdeep B. Mtharu -- Chapter 14. Sacrificial Violence and Targeting in International Humanitarian Law /Gregor Noll -- Chapter 15. J.-J. Rousseau and the Law of Armed Force /Allan Rosas -- Chapter 16. Secession, Self-determination of 'Peoples' and Recognition - the Case of Kosovo's Declaration of Independence and International Law /Per Sevastik -- Chapter 17. Fighting for Justice: Ke Hammarskjld at the Permanent Court of International Justice /Ole Spiermann -- Chapter 18. Do We Need a World Court of Human Rights? /Geir Ulfstein -- Chapter 19. Neutrality, Impartiality and Our Responsibility to Uphold International Law /Pl Wrange -- Chapter 20. The Diluted, Dismantled, Disjointed and Resilient Old Collective Security System or Decision-making and the Use of Force - the Law as It Could Be /Inger Sterdahl -- Index /Christopher Greenwood and L.H. McCormack -- International Humanitarian Law Series /Christopher Greenwood and L.H. McCormack.

Last term, in Federal Communications Commission (FCC) v. Fox Television Stations, the Supreme Court expressly refused to link ordinary administrative law to constitutional concerns, insisting that whether an agency action is "arbitrary and capricious" and whether it is unconstitutional are separate questions. In this article, I argue that Fox is wrong. The Court's protestations aside, constitutional law and ordinary administrative law are inextricably linked, with the result that a fair amount of ordinary administrative law qualifies as what Henry Monaghan famously termed constitutional common law. Its doctrines and requirements are constitutionally informed but rarely constitutionally mandated, with Congress and agencies enjoying broad power to alter specific administrative mechanisms notwithstanding their constitutional aspect. Recognizing the interrelationship between constitutional law and ordinary administrative law is important both for the ongoing debate over the legitimacy of constitutional common law and for proper appreciation of the role administrative agencies can play in our constitutional order. Underlying many attacks on constitutional common law is a view of constitutional law as having a narrow and determinate scope, but the interwoven relationship between ordinary law and constitutional law in the administrative law context suggests this view of constitutional law is a false one. In addition, seeking to enforce constitutional norms through ordinary administrative law better accords with constitutional principles than efforts to segregate out the two and is likely to prove less intrusive to the policymaking prerogatives of the political branches. As a result, the better critique is not the extent to which constitutional common law surfaces in administrative contexts, but rather the lack of transparency that accompanies it.