The frozen politics of Hong Kong
In: The world today, Band 30, Heft 6, S. 259-267
ISSN: 0043-9134
848519 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The world today, Band 30, Heft 6, S. 259-267
ISSN: 0043-9134
World Affairs Online
In: American behavioral scientist: ABS, Band 17, Heft 3
ISSN: 0002-7642
In: Social service review: SSR, Band 47, Heft 4, S. 634-635
ISSN: 1537-5404
In: Worldview, Band 16, Heft 11, S. 62-63
In: Sociology: the journal of the British Sociological Association, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 483-484
ISSN: 1469-8684
In: Growth and change: a journal of urban and regional policy, Band 4, Heft 3, S. 22-27
ISSN: 1468-2257
In: Policy studies journal: the journal of the Policy Studies Organization, Band 1, Heft 4, S. 238-244
ISSN: 1541-0072
In: International affairs, Band 49, Heft 2, S. 269-270
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: Asian survey, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 408-420
ISSN: 1533-838X
In: Australian outlook: journal of the Australian Institute of International Affairs, Band 27, Heft 1, S. 40-49
In: The China quarterly, Band 53, S. 34-66
ISSN: 1468-2648
Until the Cultural Revolution, the predominant western view of
contemporary Chinese elite conflict was that it consisted of "discussion"
(t'ao-lun) within a basically consensual
Politburo among shifting "opinion groups" with no "organized force" behind
them. The purges and accusations which began in 1965 and apparently still
continue, have shaken this interpretation, and a number of scholars have
advanced new analyses - sometimes explicit, sometimes implicit, sometimes of
general application, sometimes applied only to a particular time span or
segment of the political system. Of these new views, perhaps the most
systematic - and at the same time the one which represents the least change
from the pre-Cultural Revolution "opinion group" model - is the "policy
making under Mao" interpretation, which sees conflict as essentially a
bureaucratic decision-making process dominated by Mao.
In: Administrative Science Quarterly, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 18
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 32, Heft 1, S. 45-58
ISSN: 2325-7784
The golden era of the study of folklore in the Soviet Union was the first decade after the Revolution, when the party and government, occupied with more urgent tasks, let the literary scholars and folklorists do their work relatively undisturbed. In 1925 the so-called "magna charta libertatis" for Soviet writers was issued by the Central Committee of the party, which permitted "free competition of various groups and currents." As a result, the 1920s turned out to be rich and fruitful in literary scholarship, including folkloristics. In the study of folklore, different trends could freely coexist and thrive side by side. The most important of them were the historical school, Formalism, and the so-called Finnish school. The historical school continued the traditions of its leader Vsevolod Miller, whose first concern had been to find reflections of concrete historical reality in Russian byliny (epic songs). Thus the tendencies of the historical school are found in the commentaries to some bylina collections in 1918 and 1919, and also appeared strongly in the works of the brothers Boris and Iurii Sokolov, both of them disciples of Miller.
In: Pacific affairs: an international review of Asia and the Pacific, Band 46, Heft 2, S. 289
ISSN: 1715-3379
In: Current history: a journal of contemporary world affairs, Band 65, S. 247-251
ISSN: 0011-3530