Search results

The presence of major worldwide problems requires that social science faces tasks of universal importance. Social science has three interdependent roles in Eastern European countries: they have cognitive, ideological, & utilitarian functions. The dominant perspective is Marxism-Leninism. The progress in the social sciences may be attributed to a willingness to change, its relatively high status in the academies, & the support given by government & lay organizations. The science policy of socialist countries includes a desire to correspond with Western & Third World nations & participate in international organizations. Key elements of the policy include attention to adequate training of scientists, the simplification of funding processes for research, & the specification of the requirements for advanced degrees. Socialist countries make a distinction between humanistic & applied social sciences, the latter being of greater interest to economic development & therefore of more practical interest to the State. Forecasting economic & social development is particularly important. Progress in science is related to political considerations & academic prestige is maintained by partnership with politics, assuming social responsibilities, & fulfilling moral obligations. 1 Table. L. Kamel.

This paper contrasts the effects of trade, inward FDI and technological development upon the demand for skilled and unskilled workers in the UK. By focussing on industry level data panel data on smaller firms, the paper also contrasts these effects with those generated by large scale domestic investment. The analysis is placed within the broader context of shifts in British industrial policy, which has seen significant shifts from sectoral to horizontal measures and towards stressing the importance of SMEs, clusters and new technology, all delivered at the regional scale. This, however, is contrasted with continued elements of British and EU regional policy which have emphasised the attraction of inward investment in order to alleviate regional unemployment. The results suggest that such policies are not naturally compatible; that while both trade and FDI benefit skilled workers, they have adverse effects on the demand for unskilled labour in the UK. At the very least this suggests the need for a range of policies to tackle various targets (including in this case unemployment and social inclusion) and the need to integrate these into a coherent industrial strategy at various levels of governance, whether regional and/or national. This has important implications for the form of any 'new' industrial policy.

This article provides an introduction to the special thematic section on political mobilization in East Central Europe. Based on a brief presentation of the main arguments of the individual articles, the authors discuss the recent political volatility in East Central Europe. They highlight the tension between fierce political rhetoric and populist policies on the one hand, and low levels of voter turnout and overall political participation in the region on the other. The authors argue that recent cases of successful as well as unsuccessful political mobilization in East Central Europe point to structural re-alignments in the region's political landscape. In particular, the parties that are successful are those that manage to communicate their visions in new ways and whose messages resonate with nested attitudes and preferences of the electorate. These parties typically rally against the so-called establishment and claim for themselves an anti-hegemonic agenda. The introductory essay also asserts that these developments in East Central Europe deserve attention for their potential Europe-wide repercussions – especially the idea of "illiberal democracy,"which combines populist mobilization and autocratic demobilization and finds adherents also in more established European democracies.

'andererseits' provides a forum for research, commentary, and creative work on topics related to the German-speaking world and the field of German Studies. Works presented in the publication come from a wide variety of genres including book reviews, poetry, essays, editorials, forum discussions, academic notes, lectures, and traditional peer-reviewed academic articles. In addition, we welcome contributions by journalists, librarians, archivists, and other commentators interested in German Studies broadly conceived. By publishing such a diverse array of material, we hope to demonstrate the extraordinary value of the humanities in general, and German Studies in particular, on a variety of intellectual and cultural levels.