Suchergebnisse

Shipping list no.: 2003-0266-P. ; Caption title. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Why do legislatures pass laws that automatically expire? Why are so many tax cuts sunset? In this first book-length treatment of those questions, the author explains that legislatures pass laws temporarily in order to reduce opposition from the citizenry, to increase the level of information revealed by lobbies, and to externalize the political costs of changing the tax code on to future legislatures. This book provides a careful analysis which does not normatively prescribe either permanent or temporary legislation in every instance, but rather specifies the conditions for which either perman

The nature of investing in a company -- Members' rights -- Funding company operations -- Corporate governance -- Corporate insolvency -- Managed investment schemes -- Introduction to investments and the law -- Common law framework for market participants -- Regulation of the financial services industry : Corporations Act, chapter 7 -- Financial services conduct, disclosure, product design and distribution -- Investor protection and dispute resolution -- Insider trading : using inside information -- Investment in real property -- Bankruptcy -- Superannuation.

The legislative discreteness in the form of legal gaps and universality of ways to overcome it as an analogy of law are analyzed. It was found out that according to most modern scientists, gaps of the law and the use of analogy of law are natural and inevitable, so the courts must be improved only in the use of these methods in the resolution of cases. The author concludes that this position is mistaken, because the use of the analogy of law by its very nature inevitably creates violation of the uniformity of judicial practice. This violation is defined as one the forms of discreteness in this case – the law. It was concluded that it is necessary to fill the gaps in the law by creating a system of interaction between the judiciary and legislative bodies that can signal the presence of gaps at the time of their discovery when considering a judicial dispute. The need to use the analogy of law should be considered as the basis for lawmaking. In this case, if any of the gaps in law at the time of the consideration of its elimination has already been fixed by judicial practice, the rooted analogy of the law must be anchored in law through the introduction of the law in a direct reference to the analogous legal norms. It is also concluded that a more detailed legislation regulating the use of the analogy of law is necessary. ; Исследованы законодательная дискретность в форме правовой пробельности и универсальность таких способов ее преодоления как аналогия права и закона. Установлено, что, по мнению большинства современных ученых, пробелы в праве и применение аналогии права и закона являются естественным и неизбежным, поэтому судам необходимо лишь совершенствоваться в использовании указанных способов при разрешении судебных дел. Автор приходит к выводу, что данная позиция ошибочна, поскольку применение аналогии права и закона в силу своей природы неизбежно порождает нарушение единообразия судебной практики. Данное нарушение определяется как еще одна из форм дискретности, в данном случае – права. Сделан вывод о необходимости устранения пробелов в праве за счет создания системы взаимодействия между судебными и законодательными органами, способной сигнализировать о наличии пробелов в момент их обнаружения при рассмотрении судебного спора. Необходимость применения аналогии права или закона должна рассматриваться как основание для законотворчества. При этом в случае, если какой-либо из пробелов в праве на момент рассмотрения вопроса о его устранении уже устранен судебной практикой, укоренившаяся аналогия закона должна быть закреплена в законодательстве путем введения в закон прямой отсылки к аналоговым нормам. В статье также сделан вывод о необходимости более детальной законодательной регламентации правил использования аналогии права и закона.

1. Introduction -- 2. Locating everyday discrimination in a theory of justice -- 3. Cultural aspects of discrimination -- 4. Demeaning stereotypical representation in the media : a pervasive case of everyday discrimination -- 5. International and regional underpinnings for the redress of everyday discrimination -- 6. Everyday discrimination and hate speech -- 7. The regulation of everyday discrimination in the media -- 8. Everyday discrimination as a legal wrong -- 9. Weaknesses and potential of anti-discrimination law in redressing everyday discrimination -- 10. Conclusions.

Energy security and sustainability : in search of coherence -- Regulation : a theoretical context -- Electricity and environmental regulation : an uneasy relationship -- The Brazilian electricity sector -- Appendix I. Environmental law precedents applied to the electricity sector -- Appendix II. Connecting law, regulation and sustainable development.

At present, in international practice, the basis for the legal regulation of liability for environmental offenses has been formed. We can say that the legal regulation of relations on compensation for environmental damage has two levels. The first level is international. It includes acts adopted or approved by a group of states that adhere to uniform standards for compensation for environmental harm. The second level is national, which includes the regulations of individual states

1. Introduction -- 2. Why should we speak of equality? -- 3. Why do we value basic equality? -- 4. The scope of basic equality -- 5. Basic equality and other values -- 6. Denying basic equality -- 7. Discrimination and culture -- 8. Equality's law -- 9. Basic equality and different treatment -- 10. Affirmative action.