Suchergebnisse

The survey was done in April 1974 as a joint undertaking of the City of Ann Arbor Community Planning and Management Program and the Dept. of Political Science, University of Michigan. ; "First printing: March 1975." ; Mode of access: Internet.

Trying specifically not to fall into either eclecticism or redundancy, this paper is an attempt to develop a dialogical understanding of international relations within the meta-theoretical field of constructivism. Dialogism holds that the social world is constructed through an interweaving of mutually-responsive discourses between several agents. Further, it provides an interpretative tool, the hermeneutical locus, to understand agents' identities as a factor in international relations by discerning their expressivity, contextuality and relationality. Dealing more closely with the questions of identity and identity formation within the discipline of International Relations, the paper further regards national identity as a factor which is expressed in a particular aspect of foreign policy: the politics of alterity. Grounding my approach in the works of the Russian intellectual Mikhail Mikhailovitch Bakhtin, in the first part of the paper I define what is to be understood by dialogism and its constitutive notion of transgredience. The second part is dedicated to the actual integration of dialogism within the discipline of International Relations. An example drawn from Japanese domestic and foreign policy prior to the Second World War further facilitates the comprehension of the theoretical argument concerning the link between the national and the international in a politics of alterity.

This work exposes a panorama about the main theoretical-methodological issues of Political Science in times of postmodernity. In particular, he describes and comments on the debate generated around a text by Giovanni Sartori entitled "Where is Political Science going?". The axes of academic dialogue, which were developed in the pages of the magazines Política y Gobierno and Metapolítica, are the inputs chosen to reproduce the scope of this transcendental discussion in the politologica field. ; Este trabajo expone un panorama acerca de las principales cuestiones teórico-metodológicas de la Ciencia Política en tiempos de la posmodernidad. En particular, describe y comenta el debate generado en torno a un texto de Giovanni Sartori titulado "¿Hacia dónde va la Ciencia Política?". Los ejes del diálogo académico, que fueron desarrollados en las páginas de las revistas Política y Gobierno y Metapolítica, son los insumos elegidos para reproducir los alcances de esta trascendental discusión en el ámbito politológico.

"Serial no. 109-8." ; Shipping list no. not available. ; Distributed to some depository libraries in microfiche. ; Mode of access: Internet.