Suchergebnisse

International audience ; User engagement with data privacy and security through consent banners has become a ubiquitous part of interacting with internet services. While previous work has addressed consent banners from either interaction design, legal, and ethics-focused perspectives, little research addresses the connections among multiple disciplinary approaches, including tensions and opportunities that transcend disciplinary boundaries. In this paper, we draw together perspectives and commentary from HCI, design, privacy and data protection, and legal research communities, using the language and strategies of "dark patterns" to perform an interaction criticism reading of three different types of consent banners. Our analysis builds upon designer, interface, user, and social context lenses to raise tensions and synergies that arise together in complex, contingent, and conflicting ways in the act of designing consent banners. We conclude with opportunities for transdisciplinary dialogue across legal, ethical, computer science, and interactive systems scholarship to translate matters of ethical concern into public policy. CCS CONCEPTS • Human-centered computing → User interface design; • Social and professional topics → Governmental regulations; Codes of ethics; • Security and privacy → Social aspects of security and privacy.

International audience ; User engagement with data privacy and security through consent banners has become a ubiquitous part of interacting with internet services. While previous work has addressed consent banners from either interaction design, legal, and ethics-focused perspectives, little research addresses the connections among multiple disciplinary approaches, including tensions and opportunities that transcend disciplinary boundaries. In this paper, we draw together perspectives and commentary from HCI, design, privacy and data protection, and legal research communities, using the language and strategies of "dark patterns" to perform an interaction criticism reading of three different types of consent banners. Our analysis builds upon designer, interface, user, and social context lenses to raise tensions and synergies that arise together in complex, contingent, and conflicting ways in the act of designing consent banners. We conclude with opportunities for transdisciplinary dialogue across legal, ethical, computer science, and interactive systems scholarship to translate matters of ethical concern into public policy. CCS CONCEPTS • Human-centered computing → User interface design; • Social and professional topics → Governmental regulations; Codes of ethics; • Security and privacy → Social aspects of security and privacy.

International audience ; User engagement with data privacy and security through consent banners has become a ubiquitous part of interacting with internet services. While previous work has addressed consent banners from either interaction design, legal, and ethics-focused perspectives, little research addresses the connections among multiple disciplinary approaches, including tensions and opportunities that transcend disciplinary boundaries. In this paper, we draw together perspectives and commentary from HCI, design, privacy and data protection, and legal research communities, using the language and strategies of "dark patterns" to perform an interaction criticism reading of three different types of consent banners. Our analysis builds upon designer, interface, user, and social context lenses to raise tensions and synergies that arise together in complex, contingent, and conflicting ways in the act of designing consent banners. We conclude with opportunities for transdisciplinary dialogue across legal, ethical, computer science, and interactive systems scholarship to translate matters of ethical concern into public policy. CCS CONCEPTS • Human-centered computing → User interface design; • Social and professional topics → Governmental regulations; Codes of ethics; • Security and privacy → Social aspects of security and privacy.

Written by a scholar and activist in the centre of the current public policy debate in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, 'Necessary Noise' presents a compelling view on the uneasy balance of accomplishing change through art against the unsteady background of civil war.

During the process of globalization, western countries represented by the United States and the United Kingdom have been advocating the so-called "universal" development mode. In response to western modernization, there has always been a "counter-enlightenment" trend in Russia's cultural tradition. The fight between Slavophils and Western faction is not only a choice between two development paths, but also a confrontation between two civilizations. After the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the failure of shock therapy, traditional Russian thought has received renewed attention in contemporary times facing the current devel­opment status of Russia. Attempts have been made to construct a civilization with Russian national characteristics, so as to surpass the development of West­ern capital modernity. The works of Vladimir S. Soloviev, Nikolai A. Berdyaev, Nikolai Ya. Danilevsky formulate both the discrepancies between the founda­tions of Russian culture and the models of Westernization introduced from out­side, as well as the general principles of preserving cultural diversity in the world; many of their ideas find support and continuation in the works of modern Rus­sian philosophers, including Andrey V. Smirnov. There are some commonalities between the "Russian reflection" on Western modernization and the "Chinese wisdom" that China is now building.

This work provides the first full-scale examination of the eighteenth century periodical Political Controversy and of the essay-sheets reprinted therein, Briton, Auditor, North Briton, and Monitor. These essay-sheets were published in England at the end of the Seven Years' War with France, in support of and in opposition to Lord Bute's proposed terms in the treaty negotiations. Political Controversy reprinted the essay-sheets weekly along with the editor's annotations, material from other publications, and original contributions from readers. The journal provides modern readers with a good exa