Suchergebnisse

Research funding eligibility criteria can exclude many from applying for certain research grants. Yet, there are many research funders, governmental and private, that recognize scientific excellence without specific restrictions on citizenship or location. In these slides, first presented at the N2 Network Event hosted virtually in Berlin, Germany on October 14, 2021, Judy Mielke, founder of scientifyRESEARCH.org presents some funders that welcome applications from researchers worldwide.

Following the Lisbon Treaty, the powers of the European Parliament in external relations have gradually expanded and it is increasingly influencing the foreign policy of the European Union. This book analyses the role of the European Parliament as an international actor and presents a new debate about its role outside the EU territory. It explores different policy areas including human rights, international aid, trade, crisis management and the environment to provide a systematic analysis of the modern global role of the European Parliament. The book also considers the European Parliament's regional interactions with Africa, Latin America, the United States, Asia and the Middle East. With a common analytical framework and research covering the lifespan of the European Parliament from its first direct elections in 1979 to the present day, this comprehensive volume presents an unparalleled analysis of one of the most important institutions in the European Union. This book will be of interest to students and scholars of European Union politics and institutions, European policy, government, international relations and European history.

This title provides a critical discussion of the fault lines in the contemporary relationship between university based researchers, research funders, and the policy sector in the production and utilisation of research to inform policy and practice in ethnic relations. Drawing upon an international range of expert contributions from academics, those working in NGOs and the public sector, the detailed case studies and theoretical analysis provide challenges to both academics and policy makers to think differently about how to develop better policy agendas in this complex field

Ziel dieses Beitrags ist es, die existierende Vorstellungen über Subjektivität und Reflexivität innerhalb der Theorie internationaler Beziehungen (IR) zu diskutieren. Hierzu wird die klassische, positivistisch inspirierte Perspektive mit einer dialogischen Perspektive kontrastiert. Die dialogische Perspektive bemüht sich um eine Integration der spezifischen Verknüpfung von Identität und Alterität. Als reflexives Instrument wird der sog. "Hermeneutical Locus" vorgeschlagen: Dieser soll Möglichkeiten des Zugangs zu Subjektivität eröffnen, ohne in eine Verdinglichung oder in eine reflexive Archäologie der Disziplin IR selbst zu verfallen. In diesem Sinne ist es der Wunsch des vorgestellten, dialogischen Ansatzes, ein reflexives Instrument für und über die Theorie internationaler Beziehungen anzubieten.