Suchergebnisse

For decades, scholars have bemoaned the low relevancy and impact of most research in the leading journals in business, management, and marketing. The majority of the research that gets published, perhaps 70% of it, hardly has any measurable scholarly impact in terms of citations. Rather than low relevancy, "Bad to Good" posits that the deeper issue is the pervasive use of bad research practices appearing in most articles in almost all ranked journals in the sub-disciplines of business.With the objective of reducing the high volume of bad practices in research in finance, management and marketing, the book offers tools for improving theory construction and empirical testing of theory especially by early-to-mid scholars. "Bad to Good" covers 24 common bad practices, explaining why they are bad and how to replace them with good practices.Arch Woodside is a leading voice on how to improve business research. He served as the Editor-in-Chief of the "Journal of Business Research" (JBR) for forty years. In 2016 the JBR ranked first among the top-twenty journals in marketing in the Google.com/scholar h-5 index (an impact metric) and seventh among the strategic management sub-discipline.

Comparative data collections, transborder data transfer, ethical considerations, statistical sources, networks and interactive data resources, UNESCO's Management of Social Transformations program (MOST), and other issues; 9 articles.

We analyse topics and authorship networks in articles on agricultural transition that were published in 16 subject-related peer-review journals between 1989 and 2008. Increasingly, articles on transition are written by authors from the European Union- 15 in collaboration with authors from Central and Eastern Europe countries. The importance of authors from North America has fallen since the mid-1990s, and authors from Former Soviet Union countries have not made a large contribution to the literature. A group of roughly 10 authors plays a central role in the literature on agricultural transition, which has become increasingly method-driven and less descriptive or issue-driven over time. The co-authorship network for transition articles is characterised by a predominance of individuals or small groups of authors who have published only one or two papers. ; peerReviewed