Evangelicals and American Foreign Policy, by Mark R. Amstutz
In: International journal / CIC, Canadian International Council: ij ; Canada's journal of global policy analysis, Band 70, Heft 3, S. 499-501
455871 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International journal / CIC, Canadian International Council: ij ; Canada's journal of global policy analysis, Band 70, Heft 3, S. 499-501
In: International journal / CIC, Canadian International Council: ij ; Canada's journal of global policy analysis, Band 67, Heft 2, S. 551-553
In: International journal / CIC, Canadian International Council: ij ; Canada's journal of global policy analysis, Band 67, Heft 1, S. 137-154
In: International journal / CIC, Canadian International Council: ij ; Canada's journal of global policy analysis, Band 64, Heft 2, S. 553-564
In: International journal / CIC, Canadian International Council: ij ; Canada's journal of global policy analysis, Band 63, Heft 2, S. 263-274
In: International journal / CIC, Canadian International Council: ij ; Canada's journal of global policy analysis, Band 63, Heft 1, S. 239-240
In: NUPI Report, 201
World Affairs Online
This article consists of a comparative study of the basic principles underlying the rules of jurisdiction in private international law in commercial cases in the law of the European Union, the United States and England. It considers the objectives which these rules seek to achieve (protection of the rights of the parties and respect for the interests of foreign States) and the extent to which these objectives are attained. It takes tort claims, especially in the field of products-liability as an example and considers which system has the most exorbitant rules. It suggests explanations for the differences found.
BASE
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 71, Heft 1, S. 211-226
ISSN: 1471-6895
AbstractThis article consists of a comparative study of the basic principles underlying the rules of jurisdiction in private international law in commercial cases in the law of the European Union, the United States and England. It considers the objectives which these rules seek to achieve (protection of the rights of the parties and respect for the interests of foreign States) and the extent to which these objectives are attained. It takes tort claims, especially in the field of products-liability, as an example and considers which system has the most exorbitant rules. It suggests explanations for the differences found.
In: Working Paper CocciaLab n. 34, CNR -- National Research Council of Italy
SSRN
In: German yearbook of international law: Jahrbuch für internationales Recht, Band 43, S. [116]-148
ISSN: 0344-3094
World Affairs Online
World Affairs Online
In: Headline books 33