Policymaking in Latin America: How Politics Shapes Policies
In: Latin American politics and society, Band 51, Heft 2, S. 147-157
ISSN: 1531-426X
841320 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Latin American politics and society, Band 51, Heft 2, S. 147-157
ISSN: 1531-426X
In: Latin American politics and society, Band 50, Heft 1, S. 189-194
ISSN: 1531-426X
In: Latin American politics and society, Band 49, Heft 1, S. 141-164
ISSN: 1531-426X
World Affairs Online
In: Latin American politics and society, Band 49, Heft 1, S. 141-164
ISSN: 1531-426X
More than a decade after Latin America's most recent turn to democracy, unchecked police violence and torture continue and in some cases have increased. This study examines police killings in 19 Brazilian states from 1994 to 2001 and finds that democracy has not substantially reduced these types of human rights violations, for two reasons. First, underlying social conflict has continued to exert a significant impact on the lethal use of force by police officers. Second, pro-order political coalitions, generally represented by right-wing politicians, have blocked effective measures to control police violence and have implemented public safety measures that stress the use of force. The analysis emphasizes the nonteleological nature of democratization processes and demonstrates the strength of political forces working to maintain "illiberal democracy.". Adapted from the source document.
In: Latin American politics and society, Band 49, Heft 2, S. 209-212
ISSN: 1531-426X
In: The British journal of politics & international relations, Band 14, Heft 3, S. 346-356
ISSN: 1369-1481
World Affairs Online
In: The British journal of politics & international relations, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 264-276
ISSN: 1369-1481
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 57, Heft 4, S. 1130-1142
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 41, Heft 2, S. 478-491
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 40, Heft 3, S. 675-707
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 37, Heft 1, S. 129-162
ISSN: 1468-2508
Reduction in carbon dioxide emissions constitutes a global public good; and hence there will be strong incentives for countries to free ride in the provision of CO2 emission reductions. In the absence of more or less binding international agreements, we would expect carbon emissions to be seriously excessive, and climate change problems to be unsolvable. Against this obvious general point, we observe many countries acting unilaterally to introduce carbon emission policies. That is itself an explanatory puzzle, and a source of possible hope. Both aspects are matters of 'how politics works' - i.e. 'public choice' problems are central. The object of this paper is to explain the phenomenon of unilateral policy action and to evaluate the grounds for 'hope'. One aspect of the explanation lies in the construction of policy instruments that redistribute strategically in favour of relevant interests. Another is the 'expressive' nature of voting and the expressive value of environmental concerns. Both elements - elite interests and popular (expressive) opinion - are quasi-constraints on politically viable policy. However, the nature of expressive concerns is such that significant reductions in real GDP are probably not sustainable in the long term - which suggests that much of the CO2 reduction action will be limited to modest reductions of a largely token character. In that sense, the grounds for hope are, although not non-existent, decidedly thin.
BASE
In: Psychotherapy and Politics International, Band 15, Heft 2, S. e1412
In: Vojno delo: interdisciplinarni naučni časopis : interdisciplinary science magazine, Band 73, Heft 3, S. 21-35
ISSN: 2683-5703
The problem of the interrelationship between the political and military elite is very complex, multidimensional, multi-hierarchical and relatively protected from the scientific and professional public and, as such, more difficult to understand. It is particularly relevant in war, where ties are looser and where the self-initiative of individuals and social groups comes to full expression, which is precisely the subject of this analysis. However, the subject is not considered in its totality, but is limited only to the territory of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY) in the period from the 1980s onwards. The events out of that time were used as an empirical basis for illustrating and arguing one's own views. The subject of this paper is structured in five separate parts. In the first part, the epistemological and logic bases of the relationship between politics and the military in war are presented, with the focus on the noticed weaknesses in the theoretical and normative sphere and their consequences for real practice. In the second part, a comparative analysis of the goals of politics and the military has been done, with an emphasis on the necessary need for them to coincide at the state level and be conducted by joint efforts. The third part explains the relationship between the military and politics at the most general level. It has been proven that politics is more general and that it directs the entire activities of the society including the deployment of the military in war. The fourth part presents the models of the relationship between the military and politics at strategic level. It has been unequivocally proven that politics is superior to the military, which does not exclude the possibility of intensive negotiations before making definite decisions on the deployment in combat operations. Finally, the fifth part explains the relationship between local government representatives and units at tactical level. The links between management and cooperation between these entities with the focus on communication difficulties and consequences are explained.
In: Palgrave pivot
This book seeks to understand the politics of deservingness for future Social Security reforms through an interpretive policy analysis of the 2005 Social Security privatization debates. What does it mean for politics and policymaking that Social Security recipients are widely viewed as deserving of the benefits they receive? In the 2005 privatization debates, Congress framed Social Security in exclusively positive terms, often in opposition to welfare, and imagined their own beloved family members as recipients. Advocates for private accounts sought to navigate the politics of deservingness by dividing the "we" of social insurance to a "me" of private investment and a "them" of individual rate of return in order to justify the introduction of private accounts into Social Security. Fiscal stress on the program will likely bring Social Security to the policy agenda soon. Understanding the politics of deservingness will be central to navigating those debates