Suchergebnisse

The duality of approach that characterizes teaching International Political Economy(IPE) & Comparative Political Economy(CPE) in American universities is explored in terms of positive political economy versus structuralist approaches to argue that the disciplinary field as strongly defined by questions & texts of 15-25 years ago. A comparative review of 36 syllabi of IPE & CPE identifies the general definition as an "intertwining of politics & economics", & the primary dividing line as geographic scale. Analysis of IPE characterizes the field as dominated by several versions of the state centric approach which share a common empirical core with a liberal tenor, a thematic prevalence of hegemonic stability theory (HST) & protectionism, & a sidelining of the sectoral politics of money that is a failure to present rival theoretic explanations. The less prevalent CPE field presents a "varieties of capitalism" framework or a more liberal oriented thematic approach that share an empirical core of relative economic performance, divergent state institutional structure, & a common comparative approach. Increased mutual exchange is asserted to benefit the IPE & CPE fields, as well as a closer engagement with political economy outside political science to embrace the multidisciplinary promise of the 1970's as Marx' moral science. References. J. Harwell

Includes bibliographical references and index. ; v. 1. Sovereignty and liberty. -- v. 2. Government. ; Mode of access: Internet.

v. 1. Sovereignty and liberty.--v. 2. Government. ; Mode of access: Internet.