Suchergebnisse

Examining the jurisdiction of international arbitral tribunals, International Arbitral Jurisdiction establishes general principles relating to such jurisdiction. The study refers to the principles of consent and its limitations, and also deals with such matters as interpretation of compromis and incidental jurisdiction

1 CONTROLLINGUMFELD -- 2 GLOBALISIERUNGSEFFEKTE -- 3 INTERNATIONALE GESTALTUNGSFORMEN -- 4 CONTROLLING-KOORDINATION -- 5 INTERNATIONALE PROBLEMFELDER -- 6 UNTERSCHIEDE HGB - IAS -- 7 INTERNATIONALE RISIKEN -- 8 CONTROLLING-PLANUNGSSYSTEM -- 8.1 Gap-Analyse -- 8.2 SWOT-Analyse -- 8.3 Szenario-Analyse -- 8.4 Wertschöpfungskette -- 8.5 Lebenszyklus-Analyse -- 8.6 Portfolio-Analyse -- 8.7 Life-Cycle-Costing -- 8.8 Target Costing -- 9 CONTROLLING-KENNZAHLEN -- 9.1 Erfolgskennzahlen -- 9.2 Produktivitätskennzahlen -- 9.3 Finanzierungskennzahlen -- 9.4 Risikokennzahlen

States address many of today's global problems in international organizations (IOs). At the same time, regional international organizations (RIOs) play important roles in IOs, as a series of case studies suggests. RIO member states can speak on behalf of an RIO in IO negotiations. This paper explores under what conditions states voice RIO positions instead of national ones in IOs and thereby turn into agents of regionalization. Based on a novel dataset of more than 500 international negotiations and a quantitative analysis of theory-guided International Relations hypotheses, this paper shows that states are increasingly likely to negotiate on behalf of an RIO, when they regard grouping positions into regional blocs in IO negotiations as more effective, when they have a formal role as RIO chair, and when they possess financial and staff capacities needed in order to voice a regional position in international negotiations.