The Treaty Law of the United States
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 602-612
ISSN: 1471-6895
685694 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 602-612
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 11, Heft 4, S. 937-975
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 256-260
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 249-267
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 585-588
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 437-451
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 6, Heft 1, S. 49-60
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 5, Heft 4, S. 511-518
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 4, Heft 4, S. 533-541
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 3, Heft 2, S. 217-234
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 2, Heft 4, S. 611-614
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 1, Heft 4, S. 539-542
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 196-212
ISSN: 1471-6895
This text examines the modern law of statehood, and in particular the role of the law of self-determination in the process of the formation of States in international law. The study shows that the law of statehood has changed considerably since the establishment of the United Nations.
In: Journal of international humanitarian legal studies, Band 12, Heft 2, S. 169-197
ISSN: 1878-1527
Abstract
Ensuring humanitarian law compliance and repression of its violations receives constant reiteration but to mixed effect. While international judicial, jurisprudential and investigatory modalities have advanced, requisite State level competencies exhibit marked variability. This paper devotes most attention to disadvantaged States – those that, for whatever reason, lack the judicial, institutional or administrative capacity to ensure humanitarian law compliance and repression of its violations. Here a profile of 46 States is selected for review, 20 of which are identified as impacted by previous or continuing forms of armed conflict. Data from the World Justice Project's 2020 Rule of Law Index is utilised. Chosen indicators assess individual State legislative, judicial, due process, and criminal investigatory capacities as perceived and recorded by local publics and individual experts. A comparative evaluation of this data reveals differences within profiles of disadvantaged States. They are investigated to better comprehend humanitarian law compliance challenges facing such States. They include international cooperation, utilisation of amnesties, and the conduct of armed non-state actors. The paper's central thesis is that humanitarian law compliance, and repression of its violations, remains inadequate without remediation of the capacity impediments evident in disadvantaged States.