Suchergebnisse

Introduction: Through Spinoza's "looking glass" / Moira Gatens -- Dominance and difference : a spinozistic alternative to the distinction between "sex" and "gender" / Genevieve Lloyd -- Autonomy and the relational individual : Spinoza and feminism / Aurelia Armstrong -- Spinoza on the pathos of idolatrous love and the hilarity of true love / Amelie Rorty -- Spinoza and sexuality / Alexandre Matheron -- Reason, sexuality, and the self in Spinoza / David West -- What Spinoza can teach us about embodying and naturalizing ethics / Heidi Morrison Ravven -- Adam and the serpent : everyman and the imagination / Paola Grassi -- The envelope : a reading of Spinoza's ethics, "of God" / Luce Irigaray -- Re-reading Irigaray's Spinoza / Sarah Donovan -- The politics of the imagination / Moira Gatens -- Law and sovereignty in Spinoza's politics / Susan James

Das Buch beabsichtigt, mit den Mitteln einer phänomenologischen Semantik, einen Beitrag zum Verständnis der Modallogik und ihrer philosophischen Implikationen zu liefern. Es richtet sich in erster Linie an Phänomenologen, aber auch an analytische Philosophen und an philosophisch interessierte Logiker. Bereits im vorigen Jahrhundert begannen Mathematik und Logik, sich zu abstrakten Wissenschaften zu entwickeln. Husserl nannte die schließlich resultierende Einheit beider `Mathesis Universalis'. Diese bildet nicht nur den Boden aus dem Husserls philosophische Arbeit erwuchs, sondern auch den Rahmen, in den die moderne Modallogik zu stellen ist. Als abstrakte Disziplin der Mathesis Universalis erfordert ihre phänomenologische Aufklärung detaillierte Analysen der Genese von Modalisierung, die weit in die kognitiven Strukturen von (vorsprachlicher) Wahrnehmung hineinreichen. Das so gewonnene Verständnis von Modalisierung erbringt ein zweifaches Resultat: Zum einen kann die insbesondere im Rahmen der analytischen Philosophie geführte Diskussion der erkenntnistheoretischen und ontologischen Schwierigkeiten der Modallogik eine phänomenologische Aufklärung erfahren. Zum anderen erlaubt die Tatsache, daß der Beweisbegriff als mathematische Modalität zu verstehen ist, eine präzise phänomenologische Bestimmung des Verhältnisses von formaler Logik und Mathematik

Fascism and the conservative tradition: fascist ideology, constituency, and conditions for its growth -- The problem of German unity: absolutism and particularism -- The German empire: the containment of democracy, social imperialism, and the road to war -- Germanic ideology: nationalism, vulgarized idealism, and antisemitism -- The First World War: the crisis of imperial Germany -- The Weimar Republic and the weakness of liberal democracy -- The collapse of the Weimar Republic: the Great Depression and the rise of the Nazis -- The Nazi consolidation of power, 1933-1934 -- Economy, society, and the state in the Third Reich -- Education, culture, religion, and eugenics in the Third Reich -- Persecution of the Jews, 1933-1939 -- The origins of the Second World War -- The Second World War: from European to global war, 1939-1941 -- The Second World War: from triumph to defeat, 1942-1945 -- The Holocaust -- Continuities and new beginnings: the aftermath of National Socialism and war -- The historians' debate: the place of Hitler's Reich in German history and memory

The Book of Basis of Interpretation by Judge Numan is one of the most important Ismaili books that expresses its interpretative views on many verses. This study seeks to answer the important question of how do Judges Numan's interpretations coincide with the narrations of Allameh al-Bahrani in relation to the verses of Jesus (A.s)? This research is the documentary-analytical method and seeks to analyze the verses concerning Jesus (PBUH) in two books: The Basis of Interpretation and "Al-Burhan in the Interpretation of the Qur'an", the aspects of these two views being shared and differentiated. Explain and, through it, examine and criticize Judge Numan's intellectual foundations. The findings of this research show that Judge Numan, in his commentary and especially in his interpretations, has used his mental aptitudes more than he has expressed in a humorous way, except in very rare cases that he has not used the Ahlul-Bayt (A.S) narrations. Is and does not refer to its sources of interpretation. But an evaluation of the traditions in the book of Alburhan shows that more than half of all traditions are weak and less than a quarter of the relevant traditions are reliable. In this way, the narrations that Numan quotes from Alburhan cannot be cited. Despite Judge Numan's intellectual concessions to the issue of interpretation, there are serious drawbacks and ambiguities in his view that we will examine and critique in this article.

Abstract
The two forms of Thai reflexive anaphors, tuaɁeeŋ 'self' and tua+pronoun+Ɂeeŋ 'pronoun-self', have been claimed to exhibit different referential patterns. While tuaɁeeŋ only co-refers with a local antecedent np within the same clause, tua+pronoun+Ɂeeŋ can refer to both local and distant antecedent np s. In this study, a self-paced reading experiment was used to examine whether and how Locality Bias guided the comprehenders' online interpretation of tuaɁeeŋ and tua+pronoun+Ɂeeŋ. Our results showed that the reading time was significantly faster when a reflexive anaphor referred to a local np than when it did to a a distant np, regardless of the forms. This suggests that a local antecedent was preferred for both types of reflexives manifesting locality bias effect. Post hoc tests revealed that tua+pronoun+Ɂeeŋ appeared to be more sensitive to the locality bias than tuaɁeeŋ. This may result from the presence of the personal feature in tua+pronoun+Ɂeeŋ, which could restrict reference to local antecedents.