Translator–Author Encounters: Two Cases of Translating from Arabic
In: AWEJ for Translation & Literary Studies, Band 8
244151 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: AWEJ for Translation & Literary Studies, Band 8
SSRN
In: New political science: official journal of the New Political Science Caucus with APSA, Band 42, Heft 4, S. 637-640
ISSN: 1469-9931
In: Multiethnica, Band 39
In: The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea, Band 24, Heft 3, S. 191-222
In: The journal of popular culture: the official publication of the Popular Culture Association, Band 40, Heft 4, S. 750-752
ISSN: 1540-5931
In: Dissent: a journal devoted to radical ideas and the values of socialism and democracy, Band 52, Heft 4, S. 54-61
ISSN: 0012-3846
Although the George W. Bush administration has utilized religion to support its foreign policy agenda & advocacy of global democracy, it is stressed that previous administrations have utilized religious rhetoric & metaphors to advance the international spread of liberty. Three religious features of US religious rhetoric are identified: the US is a chosen nation; the US possesses a mission to transform the world; & the US represents the forces of good in the struggle against evil. The origins of US religious rhetoric in national politics & foreign policy are traced back to 17th century Protestant millennialism imported from Western Europe; even though Protestant millennialism is grounded upon an apocalyptic religious mentality, scrutiny of historical US foreign policy demonstrated that success in international relations & foreign policy was frequently predicated on an non-cataclysmic understanding of the US's position within the global order. It is subsequently asserted that the Bush administrations foreign policy agenda has embraced a millennialist mentality but that this perspective has failed to achieve democratization via apocalyptic confrontation throughout the Middle East. The consequences of the Bush administrations inability to recognize its foreign policy failures are also pondered. J. W. Parker
In: Dissent: a journal devoted to radical ideas and the values of socialism and democracy, S. 54-61
ISSN: 0012-3846
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 119-120
ISSN: 1537-5927
In: Systems research and behavioral science: the official journal of the International Federation for Systems Research, Band 20, Heft 3, S. 227-228
ISSN: 1099-1743
In: South Asian studies, Band 36, Heft 12, S. 185-189
In: The European legacy: the official journal of the International Society for the Study of European Ideas (ISSEI), Band 3, Heft 6, S. 87-96
ISSN: 1470-1316
In: Teaching sociology: TS, Band 16, Heft 4, S. 396
ISSN: 1939-862X
In: Teaching sociology: TS, Band 16, Heft 4, S. 390
ISSN: 1939-862X
In: Mannheimer Schriften zum Unternehmensrecht 13
Die Bedeutung und Effektivität des Allgemeinen Gleichbehandlungsgesetzes entscheidet sich anhand der Beweislastverteilung. Diese Arbeit befasst sich mit dem prozessualen Herzstück des AGG (§ 22) und klärt anhand dieser Norm die zahlreichen offenen Fragen zur Beweislast bei Benachteiligungen. Der Autor vergleicht die Vorschrift mit anerkannten Instituten des Beweisrechts, überprüft bestehende Auslegungsansätze und entwickelt die These, dass § 22 AGG eine gesetzliche widerlegliche Tatsachenvermutung darstellt. Dabei werden die Auswirkungen dieser These differenziert nach den verschiedenen Benachteiligungsformen des § 3 AGG untersucht. Im Vordergrund stehen dabei auch die Besonderheiten der Beweislastverteilung bei mittelbaren Benachteiligungen. Einen weiteren Schwerpunkt bildet die Untersuchung des Anwendungsbereiches des § 22 AGG. Thematisiert wird die Beweissituation bei Beendigung eines Arbeitsverhältnisses, bei Ansprüchen außerhalb des AGG und auch bei Ansprüchen von Betriebsräten, Gewerkschaften sowie Antidiskriminierungsverbänden. Zuletzt analysiert der Autor – auch für die Praxis – eine Vielzahl von einzelnen Tatsachen und ob diese Indizien im Sinne von § 22 AGG darstellen
In: Telos, Heft 141, S. 82-91
ISSN: 0040-2842, 0090-6514
Describes the French Law of 22 Prairial that was adopted by the National Convention on 10 June 1794. Maximilien Robespierre, president of the National Convention & dominant figure of the Committee of Public Safety (CPS), encouraged French citizens to "purify the earth that (the tyrants) have soiled." The law of 22 prairial radically reformed the revolutionary tribunal by denying the accused right to legal counsel; allowing the prosecution to present "moral" proofs of guilt in the absence of (or in addition to) material evidence; & accelerating the judicial process. It is noted that the new law initiated the period known as the "Great Terror" in which 1,400 people were sentenced to death within the space of seven weeks. Possible motives for the CPS to turn the tribunal into a killing machine & to depart so radically from more enlightened norms of judicial processes are considered. Particular attention is given to the natural right theory upon which the legal process of the 22 prairial law is based. J. Lindroth