Standing in Between Sexual Violence Victims and Access to Justice: The Limits of Title IX
In: Oklahoma Law Review, Band 73
829244 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Oklahoma Law Review, Band 73
SSRN
In: Oklahoma Law Review, Band 68, Heft 165, S. 2015
SSRN
In: Florida Law Review, Band 66, Heft 6
SSRN
In: Fordham Law Review, Band 82
SSRN
In: Military Law Review, Band 170
SSRN
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 42, Heft 1, S. 136-155
ISSN: 1469-9044
AbstractMy aim in this article is to ask how both the findings and the limitations of social science should inform the debate on global economic justice among liberal political philosophers. More specifically, I make three claims. First, I show that social science research casts doubt on key premises of important liberal global justice theories. However, second, I also suggest that empirical questions pivotal to these theories bring to the fore important limitations inherent to social science work on global issues. These limitations lead me to argue, third, that new normative concerns should feature in liberal discussions about global reform.
In: Analyse & Kritik: journal of philosophy and social theory, Band 31, Heft 2, S. 319-338
ISSN: 2365-9858
Abstract
In this paper I argue that when thinking about justice, political philosophers should pay more attention to social norms, not just the usual subjects of basic principles, rights, laws, and policies. I identify two widely-endorsed ideas about political philosophy that interfere with recognizing the importance of social norms-ideas I dub 'compulsoriness' and 'institutionalism'-and argue for their rejection. I do this largely by focusing on questions about who can and should be an agent of justice. I argue that careful reflection on these questions supports a kind of pluralism that reveals the importance of social norms, three types of which I discuss.
The subject of this paper is distributive justice in relation to financing greenhouse gas abatement. After separating the various questions of distributive justice in climate change (first section) and isolating the financing issue (second section), the paper explores whether any effective moral norms resolving this question already exist. It is argued that such norms still have to be constructed. As a basis for the further discussion, a criterion for moral duties is proposed, progressive norm welfarism, which takes up the constructivist idea (third section). Ethical , intuitive, moral and political considerations finally converge into a proposal for 'no harm to developing countries' (fourth section).
BASE
In: Cambridge review of international affairs, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 298-312
ISSN: 1474-449X
'Justice and Natural Resources' provides a systematic account of how to think about natural resources and the conflicting claims people have over them.
Blog: Thom Brooks
Delighted my next book Global Justice: An Introduction is completed and in production for release in a few months. Expect to find more details here soon...
In: The current digest of the Soviet press: publ. each week by The Joint Committee on Slavic Studies, Band 38, S. 6-7
ISSN: 0011-3425
The field of international probation has been surprisingly under-investigated by researchers or policy makers. In collaboration with the British Home Office, the United Nations Crime and Research Unit is currently completing the first study of probation systems around the world, including the US and Canada. The consultant of this project, Robert Harris and his co-editors have complied the findings into this book
In: American political science review, Band 102, Heft 4, S. 435-452
ISSN: 1537-5943
The actual impact of judicial decisions often depends on the behavior of executive and legislative bodies that implement the rulings. Consequently, when a court hears a case involving the interests of those controlling the executive and legislative institutions, those interests can threaten to obstruct the court's intended outcome. In this paper, we evaluate whether and to what extent such constraints shape judicial rulings. Specifically, we examine how threats of noncompliance and legislative override influence decisions by the European Court of Justice (ECJ). Based on a statistical analysis of a novel dataset of ECJ rulings, we find that the preferences of member-state governments—whose interests are central to threats of noncompliance and override—have a systematic and substantively important impact on ECJ decisions.
In: Pacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal, Band 25
SSRN