Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
196015 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Harvard Law School studies in criminology
In: SUNY Buffalo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-015
SSRN
In: Ottawa Law Review, Band 30, Heft 2
SSRN
In: Flynn, A., Hodgson, J., McCulloch, J. and Naylor, B. (2016) "Legal Aid and the Right to a Fair Trial: A Question of Human Rights" 40 (1) Melbourne University Law Review
SSRN
Working paper
In: Odermatt , J 2018 , ' Unidentified Legal Object: Conceptualising the European Union in International Law ' , Connecticut Journal of International Law , vol. 33 , no. 2 , pp. 215-247 .
What is the European Union? This seemingly simple question gives rise to a multitude of different answers from EU lawyers, international lawyers, political scientists, and the media. The debate is as old as European integration, and a satisfying answer still alludes us. Does the legal characterization of the EU and EU law matter from a legal standpoint? This article argues that such characterizations do matter. It first discusses four main ways in which the EU is perceived in the EU law and international law literature: (i) the EU as a 'new legal order'; (ii) the EU as a 'self-contained regime' in international law; (iii) the EU as a 'Regional Economic Integration Organization' (REIO); and (iv) the EU as a 'Classic intergovernmental organization' (Classic IO). Using examples from recent legal practice, this article shows how such characterizations are the 'starting points' in debates which can shape legal outcomes. It is difficult to overcome such divergent views, however, since they represent much deeper disagreements and power relations. Developing a theory of EU legal character gives rise to new challenges.
BASE
In: Studies in law, politics, and society Volume 78
This special issue of Studies in Law, Politics, and Society aims to foster a dialogue that is inclusive, constructive, and innovative in order to lay the basis for evaluating the usefulness and impact of cultural expertise in modern litigation. It investigates the scope of cultural expertise as a new socio-legal concept that broadly concerns the use of social sciences in connection with rights and the solution of conflicts. While the definition of cultural expertise is new, the conflicts it applies to are not, and these range from criminal law to civil law, including international human rights. In this special issue, socio-legal scientists with interdisciplinary backgrounds scrutinize the applicability of the notion of cultural expertise in Europe and the rest of the World. Cases include murder, female genital mutilation, earthquake claims, Islamic law, underage marriages, child custody, adoption, land rights, and asylum. The authors debate on a variety of themes, such as legal pluralism, ethnicity, causal determinism, reification of culture, and the "culturalization" of defendants. The volume concludes with an overview of the ethical implications of the definition of cultural expertise and suggestions for a way forward.
In: Studies in law, politics, and society, Band 30, S. 33-50
This essay explores a radical shift in how the relationship between the power to punish & sovereignty has been conceived in modern US law, focusing on the quiet death of comity as an operative principle in the exercise of criminal jurisdiction. While this essay attends to certain legal issues arising from historical intersections of federal, state, & Indian sovereignty in the field of criminal law, this essay is not an attempt to directly evaluate the history of federal policies applied to Indian tribes or tribal lands. Nor is this essay in any strict sense a legal history of federal-tribal relations or federal penal policy in relation to Indian tribes. Rather, I am concerned here with a series of liminal moments in the US legal tradition in which the power to punish came to be understood ever more one-sidedly, as an atomizing attribute of sovereignty rather than an identifying feature of community within a pluralistic legal framework. 11 References. Adapted from the source document.
In: Georgetown Law Journal, Band 100, Heft 1587
SSRN
In: Texas international law journal, Band 34, Heft 2, S. 211-286
ISSN: 0163-7479
In: The American Law Institute reporters studies on WTO law
This book brings together the 2008 output of the American Law Institute (ALI) project on World Trade Organization Law. Each chapter focuses on a different dispute from the adjudicating bodies of the WTO. Each case is jointly evaluated by well known experts in trade law and international economics. ALI reporters critically review the jurisprudence of WTO adjudicating bodies and evaluate whether the ruling 'makes sense' from an economic as well as a legal point of view, and, if not, whether the problem lies in the interpretation of the law or the law itself. The studies do not always cover all issues discussed in a case, but they seek to discuss both the procedural and the substantive issues that form, in the reporters' views, the 'core' of the dispute. This paperback will be an invaluable resource for students, lecturers and practitioners of international trade law
The article analyzes the changes that have occurred in the criminal procedure legislation in 2018. This article is a logical continuation of a series of articles in which the author makes an annual analysis of the changes made in this branch of law in order to assess the effectiveness of the newly introduced criminal procedure regulation and its characteristics. The properties of hyperactive lawmaking are considered. It is stated that, despite the excessively large number of changes introduced into the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, it does not get better, and its repressiveness is increasing. It increases the number of flaws, which sometimes even causes some authors to talk about the adoption of a new Criminal Procedure Code. There is disagreement with this position and it is proposed that, if we do not introduce a moratorium on introducing amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure, then we will drastically reduce them. Changes to the Code of Criminal Procedure should not be made by a conjuncture hyperactive lawmaking, but by a thoughtful, fundamental, integrated approach with preliminary extensive discussion. As a model, it is proposed to consider the Criminal Procedure Code of France, where criminal procedure relations are described more fully and democratically. ; В статье анализируются изменения, произошедшие в уголовно-процессуальном законодательстве в 2018 году. Данная статья является логическим продолжением серии статей, в которых автор подвергает ежегодному анализу производимые изменения в этой отрасли права с целью оценить эффективность вновь вводимого уголовно-процессуального регулирования и его характеристик. Рассматриваются свойства гиперактивного законотворчества. Констатируется, что, несмотря на чрезмерно большое количество изменений, вводимых в УПК РФ, он не становится лучше, а его репрессивность усиливается. В нем увеличивается количество изъянов, что порой даже заставляет некоторых авторов говорить о принятии нового УПК. Высказывается несогласие с такой позицией и предлагается если уж не ввести мораторий на внесение изменений в УПК, то резко их сократить. Изменения в УПК следует вносить не конъюнктурным гиперактивным законотворчеством, а вдумчивым, фундаментальным, комплексным подходом с предварительным широким обсуждением. В качестве образца предлагается рассмотреть УПК Франции, где уголовно-процессуальные отношения изложены более полно и демократично.
BASE
The essence of concepts of the legal law and the rule of law is analyzed in the article. An increased attention is given to the legal regulation of law enforcement, law application activities, the qualitative transformation of the political and state-legal system, the formation of civil society and the supremacy of law, the growth of the value of law and the strengthening of law.One of the objective trends in the development of the legislation of modern Russia is to increase the social significance and authority of the legal law as an act at the top of the legal system on which the level of the rule of law of any civilized society depends. ; В статье проанализирована сущность понятий правового закона и правовой законности. Усиленное внимание отводится правовому регулированию правоохранительной, правоприменительной деятельности, качественному преобразованию политической и государственно-правовой системы, становлению гражданского общества и правового государства, роста ценности права и укрепления законности.Одной из объективных тенденций развития законодательства современной России является повышение социальной значимости и авторитета правового закона как акта, стоящего на вершине правовой системы, от которого зависит и уровень правовой законности любого цивилизованного общества.
BASE