About Şirin Tekeli
In: Aspasia: international yearbook of Central, Eastern, and Southeastern European women's and gender history, Band 12, Heft 1
ISSN: 1933-2890
821962 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Aspasia: international yearbook of Central, Eastern, and Southeastern European women's and gender history, Band 12, Heft 1
ISSN: 1933-2890
In: Aspasia: international yearbook of Central, Eastern, and Southeastern European women's and gender history, Band 12, Heft 1
ISSN: 1933-2890
In: Aspasia: international yearbook of Central, Eastern, and Southeastern European women's and gender history, Band 12, Heft 1
ISSN: 1933-2890
In: Central European history, Band 50, Heft 4, S. 584-586
ISSN: 1569-1616
In: Central European history, Band 50, Heft 4, S. 575-577
ISSN: 1569-1616
In: Central European history, Band 50, Heft 4, S. 447-448
ISSN: 1569-1616
In: Central European history, Band 50, Heft 4, S. 573-575
ISSN: 1569-1616
In: Central European history, Band 50, Heft 4, S. 588-590
ISSN: 1569-1616
In: Central European history, Band 50, Heft 4, S. f1-f5
ISSN: 1569-1616
In: Central European history, Band 50, Heft 4, S. b1-b14
ISSN: 1569-1616
In: Central European history, Band 50, Heft 4, S. 586-588
ISSN: 1569-1616
In: Central European history, Band 50, Heft 4, S. 514-546
ISSN: 1569-1616
AbstractThis article traces the rise of new ideas about energy and growth in West Germany between 1973 and 1986. It shows how new economic expertise emerged in response to the oil shocks, and looks at how West Germany could, paradoxically, sustain growth in a world of seemingly exhausted and insecure energy sources. These experts reconceptualized the economy to imagine a future where "decoupling"—reducing energy consumption while expanding Gross Domestic Production—was possible. They found support in the Social Democratic Party, which, in using their ideas to overcome an internal rift precipitated by the rise of the Green movement in the 1970s, helped make these new ideas mainstream. Investigating this new energy paradigm helps us understand why Germany began to diverge from other large, industrialized states in the 1980s, as it increasingly focused on energy conservation rather than on expanding its energy supply.
In: Central European history, Band 50, Heft 4, S. 471-492
ISSN: 1569-1616
AbstractIn January 1919, theBürgertumof the Bavarian town of Hof voted overwhelmingly for the left-liberal German Democratic Party (Deutsche Demokratische Partei, DDP). But the following summer, in theReichstagelections of June 1920, the Democrats sustained significant losses against the right-wing nationalist Bavarian Middle Party (Bayerische Mittelpartei, BMP). This article explores the rise and fall of the DDP in Hof by showing that a pro-republican politics initially proved popular among the localBürgertum, until its credibility was undermined and ultimately destroyed by a series of devastating crises: the BavarianRäterepublikof April 1919, the publication of the Versailles Treaty a month later, and the revolutionary and counterrevolutionary convulsions triggered by the Kapp Putsch in March 1920. This article concludes that political violence and a burgeoning confrontation betweenbürgerlicheand socialist milieus were the key factors in explaining the eclipse of left-liberalism in Hof during the first years of the Weimar Republic.
In: Central European history, Band 50, Heft 4, S. 493-513
ISSN: 1569-1616
AbstractA variety of external forces led to the division of Germany after 1945, and, almost three decades after the fall of the Berlin Wall, division continues to persist as a social, economic, and political factor in united Germany. This article contributes to scholarly efforts aimed at delineating the ways in which division became a component in the self-perception of many Germans. Focusing on farmers, it shows that their attachment to the land was one such path. At the same time, it argues that farmers were among the first to contend with division in 1945 and, as the most numerous participants in the so-called Little Border Traffic (Kleine Grenzverkehr) between the two postwar states, were keenly aware of the growing division of Germany from its earliest days. The article highlights the choice that farmers made between living in East or in West Germany, arguing that because crossing the border was optional until the mid-1960s, and because land was much less available in the West than in the East, many East German farmers came to associate life in West Germany with the loss of land—and life in East Germany with an ability to keep it. When deciding to stay put, flee westward, or move from West to East, farmers prioritized the degree to which they were attached to their land and property. By making that choice, they cemented their self-perception as belonging to one of the opposing sides. This was not an ideological declaration per se, but rather one rooted in eminently practical considerations.
In: Central European history, Band 50, Heft 4, S. 582-583
ISSN: 1569-1616