Revolutionary Marxism in Spain, 1930-1937 examines the impact of Trotsky's political thought upon those Spanish communists who dissented from the 'general line' laid down by Moscow. Using Spanish sources it sets out the position of the POUM and engages with scholarly debates around its role in the Spanish Popular Front, Civil War and Revolution.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Recent debates over Leon Trotsky's idea of 'uneven and combined development' (U&CD) have focused on its potential in the field of International Relations, but they have not established the source of this potential. Does it derive from the philosophical premises of dialectics? The present article argues that the idea of U&CD in fact involves an innovation as fundamental for Marxist dialectics as for other branches of social theory. And it also argues that in formulating this innovation, Trotsky provided a general solution to some of the most basic problems in social and international thought. The argument is set out in three parts. The first part reconstructs Trotsky's own account of dialectical premises and their implications for social explanation. The second shows how the concept of U&CD departs from this, in ways that presuppose the tacit addition of a further ontological premise. Finally, part three analyses the locus classicus of the concept -- the opening chapter of Trotsky's History of the Russian Revolution -- showing how it is this additional premise which underpins the central achievement of the idea: its incorporation of 'the international' into a theory of history. Adapted from the source document.
AbstractRecent debates over Leon Trotsky's idea of 'uneven and combined development' (U&CD) have focused on its potential in the field of International Relations, but they have not established the source of this potential. Does it derive from the philosophical premises of dialectics? The present article argues that the idea of U&CD in fact involves an innovation as fundamental for Marxist dialectics as for other branches of social theory. And it also argues that in formulating this innovation, Trotsky provided a general solution to some of the most basic problems in social and international thought. The argument is set out in three parts. The first part reconstructs Trotsky's own account of dialectical premises and their implications for social explanation. The second shows how the concept of U&CD departs from this, in ways that presuppose the tacit addition of a further ontological premise. Finally, part three analyses the locus classicus of the concept – the opening chapter of Trotsky's History of the Russian Revolution – showing how it is this additional premise which underpins the central achievement of the idea: its incorporation of 'the international' into a theory of history.
In: The Australian journal of politics and history: AJPH, Band 27, Heft 3, S. 418-446
ISSN: 1467-8497
Book reviewed in this article:THE RISE OF ANGLO‐GERMAN ANTAGONISM 1860–1914. By Paul Kennedy.DOCUMENTS ON AUSTRALIAN FOREIGN POLICY 1937–49. Volume IV: July 1940–June 1941. Edited by W. J. Hudson and H. J. W. Stokes.AUSTRALIA AND THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS. By W. J. Hudson.MY DEAR P.M.: R. G. Casey's letters to S. M. Bruce 1924–1929. Edited by W. J. Hudson & Jane North.A HISTORY OF AUSTRALIAN EDUCATION. By Alan Barcan.THE ABORIGINAL POPULATION OF AUSTRALIA. By L. R. Smith.AGAINST THE TIDE. By B. A. Santamaria.RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT IN AUSTRALIA. Edited by Patrick Weller and Dean Jaensch.ESSAYS ON WESTERN AUSTRALIAN POLITICS. Edited by Ralph Pervan and Campbell Sharman.ECONOMIC CRISIS, CITIES AND REGIONS: an analysis of current urban and regional problems in Australia. By Frank J. B. Stilwell with contributions by Graham Larcombe.LOCAL GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS OF AUSTRALIA. Edited by J. Power, R. Wettenhall and J. Halligan.STATE GOVERNMENTS AND AUSTRALIAN TARIFF POLICY. Ry John Warhurst.SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND PUBLIC POLICY: An International Perspective. Edited by Sol Encel and Jarlath Ronayne.PUBLIC CHOICE IN TASMANIA: Aspects of the Lower Gordon River Hydro‐Electric Development Proposal. By Hugh Saddler, Jeff Bennett, Ian Reynolds and Ben Smith.INDUSTRIAL ACTION: Patterns of Labour Conflict. Edited by Stephen J. Frenkel.WAR FOR THE ASKING: Australia's Vietnam Secrets. By Michael Sexton.THE MILITARY AND AUSTRALIA'S DEFENCE. Edited by F. A. Mediansky.LEGISLATION AND SOCIETY IN AUSTRALIA. Edited by Roman Tomasic.EROSION OF THE JUDICIAL PROCESS: An Aspect of Church‐State Entanglement in Australia. The struggle of citizens to be heard in the Australian Full High Court on the State Aid issue: 1956–1980. By M. J. Ely.THE AUSTRALIAN WELFARE STATE. By M. A. Jones.A COMPARATIVE APPROACH TO POLICY ANALYSIS: Health Care Policy in Four Nations. By Howard M. Leichter.A SUITABLE PIECE OF REAL ESTATE: American Installations in Australia. By Desmond Ball.THE MEDIA AND POLITICS IN AUSTRALIA. Edited by David Turbayne.VICEROY OF THE PACIFIC: The Majesty of Colour. A Life of Sir John Bates Thurston. By Deryck Scarr.MILITARY POWER AND POLICY IN ASIAN STATES: China, India, Japan. Edited by Onkar Marwah and Jonathan D. Pollock.THE CAMBRIDGE HISTORY OF CHINA. Vol 11: Late Ch'ing 1800–1911. Part 2. Edited by John K. Fairbank and Kwang‐Ching Liu.MAO: A Biography. By Ross Terrill.WHO'S WHO OF BRITISH MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT. Volume 111, 1919–1945. A Biographical Dictionary of the House of Commons. Edited by Michael Stenton and Stephen Lees.LLOYD GEORGE'S SECRETARIAT. By John Turner.RELIGION AND PUBLIC DOCTRINE IN MODERN ENGLAND. By Maurice Cowling.BRITAIN SINCE 1918. Second Edition. By Bentley B. Gilbert.THE TRIUMPHS OF PROVIDENCE. The Assassination Plot, 1696. By Jane Garrett.THE LIBERALS AND IRELAND: The Ulster Question in British Politics to 1914. By Patricia Jalland.THE OTHER WESTERN EUROPE: A Political Analysis of the Smaller Democracies. By Earl H. Fry and Gregory A. Raymond.STATE AND SOCIETY IN EUROPE, 1550–1650. By V. G. Kiernan.THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF GERMANY IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY. By Karl Hardach.IN THE EYE OF THE STORM: Kurl Riezler and the Crises of Modern Germany. By Wayne C. Thompson.AUGUST BEBEL: Shadow Emperor of the German Workers. By William Harvey Maehl.THE SOVIETIZATION OF UKRAINE 1917–1923: The Communist Doctrine and Practice of National Self‐Determination. Revised Edition. By Jurij Borys.UKRAINIAN NATIONALISM IN THE POST–STALIN ERA: Myth, Symbols and Ideology in Soviet Nationalities Policy. By Kenneth C. Farmer.STRIKES. By Norman McCord.ELECTORAL PARTICIPATION: A Comparative Analysis. Edited by Richard Rose.THE FIRST CRUSADE. By Steven Runciman.THE DIPLOMACY OF IDEAS: U.S. Foreign Policy and Cultural Relations, 1938–1950. By Frank A. Ninkovich.CAUDILLO AND PEASANT IN THE MEXICAN REVOLUTION. Edited by D. A. Brading.MORAL PRINCIPLES AND POLITICAL OBLIGATIONS. By A. John Simmons.PEOPLE'S HISTORY AND SOCIALIST THEORY. Edited by Raphael Samuel.EDMUND BURKE AND THE CRITIQUE OF POLITICAL RADICALISM. By Michael Freeman.COMPARING POLITICAL THINKERS. Edited by Ross Fitzgerald.AUTHORITY AND DEMOCRACY. By April Carter.THE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL THOUGHT OF LEON TROTSKY. By Baruch Knei‐Paz.FABIANISMUS UND BERNSTEIN'SCHER REVISIONISMUS 1884–1900. By Herbert Frei.THE DOMINANT IDEOLOGY THESIS. By Nicholas Abercrombie, Stephen Hill and Bryan S. Turner.
The collective memory of the left has obscured the significance of the Hungarian revolution. A contrast can be found in the readiness of leftists to remember the Czech experience. Essentially, Czechoslovakia underwent a reform, while Hungary underwent a revolution; this accounts for the difference. Neither Maoists nor Trotskyites have been able to conceive of a new system of domination in which the bureaucratic class & the communist party dominate society; at most they are able to accuse the Soviets of restoring bourgeois ideology. In fact, the Hungarian revolution was a revolution against totalitarianism; the Trotskyites at least supported this revolution even without understanding it, while the Maoists have consistently supported the crushing of Hungary. It was a profound shock that a revolution could occur against the USSR, one which made it essentially impossible for anyone to grasp that a revolution was occurring. The destruction of this revolution by the USSR destroyed the myth of the proletarian state. In the Hungarian revolution, what was sought was the destruction of state ownership of the means of production, without return to private property & bourgeois democracy. The aim rather was liberty & truth, embodied in government by workers' councils. This is outside the vision of leftists preoccupied with centers of power, & so has not been well understood. W. H. Stoddard.
En la presente tesis doctoral se analiza, desde tres prácticas políticas específicas (la prensa, el militante, el internacionalismo y la sociabilidad transnacional), la conformación y el desenvolvimiento político de las organizaciones que durante el lapso temporal, 1929-1976, se autodenominaron trotskistas en México. El trotskismo se entiende aquí como una tendencia política cuya matriz se encuentra en el marxismo y el comunismo soviético leninista. Se concibe aquí al trokismo como un movimiento revolucionario que, junto con su figura insigne León Trosky, pugnó por la revolución de la dirigencia soviética dominante y por la instauración del socialismo a escala mundial.