Suchergebnisse

The International Labor Organization has become one of the most active of all the international institutions of the post-war period. According to the treaty of Versailles, international labor conferences, composed of delegates from countries which are members of the International Labor Organization, are to meet annually to consider and adopt recommendations and conventions applicable to labor problems and conditions throughout the world. The subjects for a number of possible agreements are suggested in the Versailles treaty, and include the right of association of laborers, the establishment of the eight-hour day, the adoption of the weekly rest period, the abolition of child labor, and various related matters. In drafting conventions and recommendations, the conferences are to be guided by a number of principles laid down in the Versailles treaty, and are asked to recognize that "differences of climate, habit and customs, of economic opportunity and industrial tradition, make strict uniformity in the conditions of labor difficult of immediate attainment."Economic difficulties alone were recognized, at first, by the makers of the treaty of Versailles as standing in the way of the attainment of "strict uniformity in the conditions of labor." It was, however, soon brought to the attention of the Peace Conference that governments might not all prove equally competent constitutionally to deal with labor problems, and that some might prove totally lacking in legal capacity to adhere to the proposed labor conventions. This legal limitation was felt to be especially likely to arise in the case of federal governments, in many of which all matters of labor legislation are reserved to the member-states, and hence are beyond the legislative powers of the central governments. It was predicted by some that these legal difficulties would prove more stubborn obstacles to the uniform regulation of labor matters than differences in climate, habits and customs, and economic opportunity.

This paper outlines the origins and institutionalization process of French political science since 1945. It sketches the present state of the discipline, and it analyses recent trends that appear almost as a form of 'de-institutionalization'. Overall, the discipline is quite well entrenched and is independent in terms of recruitment with its own teaching and research branches. However, political scientists suffer from a relative lack of visibility in the public space in comparison with their colleagues from more prominent disciplines. In many fields French political science remains invisible at the international level, though this may change considerably in the years to come. The main element of uncertainty comes from the ongoing reforms, the redefinition of the partnership between universities, the Instituts d'Etudes Politiques and the CNRS, and the way the autonomy of universities will be implemented. Adapted from the source document.

Swedish research on politics during the fifteen year period 1960–1975 has not been confined to the departments of political science in Sweden. Research of this kind has also occurred in other university departments as well as outside the universities. However, the major portion of the country's political research has taken place within the framework of political science.

ABSTRACTThis essay consists of idiosynratic reflections on research methodology based on a long career.

The governance of research ethics in Canada, including its research ethics boards (REBs),
which correspond to the institutional review boards in the U.S., often is portrayed as an
exemplary model of cross-disciplinary cooperation and consultation that is altruistically
striving to protect research subjects from abuses in biomedical, social sciences, and
humanities research. While there is indeed a great deal of altruism and good intention among
those involved in this governance, power and interests also play a role that is of
particular concern for political scientists. Governance arrangements have been driven by
biomedical research, which is vastly better funded than social sciences and humanities (SSH)
research. These arrangements have been imposed on the SSH research community with little
sensitivity to the distinctive problems of SSH research, despite concerns about such
problems that political scientists and other SSH researchers have expressed for a decade. A
recent proposal initiated by major research funders to dramatically strengthen research
ethics governance has generated even more alarm.

Mode of access: Internet. ; Latest issue consulted: 1916-1917. ; Description based on: 1900-1901; title from title page.

1. Introduction; 2. The political process; 3. Administrative efficiency; 4. Competition among governments; 5. Fiscal policy and redistribution; 6. Fiscal coordination and incentives; 7. Citizens and government; 8. Checks, balances, and freedom; 9. Acquiring and using knowledge; 10. Ethnic conflict and secession; 11. Data to the rescue?; 12. Conclusion: rethinking decentralization.