The Casablanca Arbitration
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 3, Issue 4, p. 946-946
ISSN: 2161-7953
831943 results
Sort by:
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 3, Issue 4, p. 946-946
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 3, Issue 4, p. 1017-1018
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 3, Issue 4, p. 1011-1013
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 3, Issue S4, p. 306-308
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 3, Issue S4, p. 328-330
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 3, Issue 4, p. 828-868
ISSN: 2161-7953
Following the issue of the Philippines Report, and as the diplomatic correspondence proceeded, which led to the International Commission, action after action was taken by the interested governments to control or stamp out the misuse of opium. The Chinese government was prompt, and her leaders and people enthusiastic. January, 1906, saw four of her great viceroys publish a manifesto on the subject. Part of it ran: " As Great Britain is the friend of China, she will shortly be called to assist the Chinese government to stamp out the evil." The Chinese government prohibited, without qualification, the use of opium in the Imperial colleges and schools, and in the recently created army.
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 3, Issue 4, p. 1048-1051
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 3, Issue 4, p. 983-985
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 3, Issue 4, p. 990-1001
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 3, Issue S4, p. 282-283
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 3, Issue S4, p. 286-289
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 3, Issue 4, p. 1029-1036
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 3, Issue 4, p. 909-927
ISSN: 2161-7953
In previous papers of this Journal I have shown that the Department of State was created to manage not only the foreign affairs of the government, but such domestic executive business as did not naturally fall under the war and treasury departments; and in addition it has performed certain temporary or occasional duties some of which have passed to other departments and some of which are still under its jurisdiction. In the natural expansion of the business of the government the tendency has been to transfer from the Department all those duties which are purely domestic, and those which have been thus transferred will now be considered.
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 3, Issue 4, p. 885-908
ISSN: 2161-7953
In the very able paper appearing in a previous issue of this Journal, discussing the question of whether the United States should or should not fortify the Panama Canal, the writer states his conclusion that we are legally and morally bound to abstain from fortifying, that the advantages which fortifications might give are more than offset by their disadvantages, and, irrespective of the question of legality, it is bad public policy and strategy to fortify.
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Volume 3, Issue 4, p. 954-958
ISSN: 2161-7953