THE BOSNIAN WAR (1992–95)
In: Just War, Second Edition, S. 198-218
2120 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Just War, Second Edition, S. 198-218
In: Godišnjak / Akademija Nauka i Umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine: Jahrbuch / Akademie der Wissenschaften und Künste von Bosnien-Herzegowina, Band 43, S. 113-120
ISSN: 2232-7770
In: Ethnos: journal of anthropology, Band 76, Heft 4, S. 565-567
ISSN: 1469-588X
In: The journal of strategic studies, Band 27, Heft 4, S. 708-711
ISSN: 0140-2390
In: Dissent: a journal devoted to radical ideas and the values of socialism and democracy, Band 42, Heft 2, S. 193-194
ISSN: 0012-3846
In: RFE RL research report: weekly analyses from the RFERL Research Institute, Band 3, Heft 33, S. 1-5
ISSN: 0941-505X
Der Verfasser arbeitet neue Aspekte im Vorschlag der internationalen Kontaktgruppe für eine Beilegung des Bosnienkonflikts heraus. Hierzu zählen die Einbeziehung der USA und Rußlands sowie die Detailliertheit der vorgeschlagenen Teilungspläne. Er stellt im folgenden die Reaktionen der Konfliktparteien, vor allem die schroffe Ablehnung des Friedensplans durch die bosnischen Serben, dar und fragt nach möglichen Reaktionen der internationalen Kontaktgruppe. Ein spektakuläres Ergebnis der Ablehnung des jüngsten Friedensplans für Bosnien ist die Spaltung zwischen Restjugoslawien und den bosnischen Serben. Abschließend werden Perspektiven der weiteren Entwicklung des Bosnienkonflikts diskutiert. (BIOst-Wpt)
World Affairs Online
In: RFE RL research report: weekly analyses from the RFERL Research Institute, Band 3, S. 1-5
ISSN: 0941-505X
In: Commentary, Band 96, Heft 4, S. 27-32
ISSN: 0010-2601
World Affairs Online
In: USAK Yearbook of International Politics and Law, Band 6, S. 253-258
In: The Slavonic and East European review: SEER, Band 9, S. 312-334
ISSN: 0037-6795
In: Social Inclusion, Band 12
ISSN: 2183-2803
This article draws on materials collected during ethnographic fieldwork among Bosnian Roma refugees who reconstructed homes in an urban shanty at the periphery of Rome (Italy). In the last two decades, many of these Roma started building or refurbishing houses in villages in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, close to the Serbian Republic (where their former home village is now situated). The construction, refurbishing, and maintenance of these houses played (and still play) a role in the local economy; they also changed the local landscape and became the mark of a new but intermittent presence in post‐Dayton Bosnia. The houses and the transnational practices connected to them have become tokens of economic success and aspirations that revolve around both the Bosnian context and the Roman one. They also express nostalgic attachments to a lost homeland radically transformed by war, foreign interventions, and the advent of the market economy and eventually turned into an unfamiliar place. This article builds on the literature on transnational migration and material culture and explores the ambivalence and complexity of transnational trajectories that stretch between an urban context in the EU and a rural one in non‐EU and reveals complex scenarios of identity, movements, and unlikely returns.
In: Nationalities papers: the journal of nationalism and ethnicity, Band 25, Heft 2, S. 317
ISSN: 0090-5992
In: Journal of refugee studies, Band 9, Heft 4, S. 442-443
ISSN: 0951-6328