Evidence in Criminal Proceedings
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 21, Heft 4, S. 796-800
ISSN: 1471-6895
680475 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 21, Heft 4, S. 796-800
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: THE PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF CRIMINAL LAW, Duff and Green, eds., Oxford University Press, 2011
SSRN
In: Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, Band 18, S. 212-225
ISSN: 0165-070X
ISSN: 1741-6191
In: Studies in international law volume 63
Introduction -- Origins of complicity: domestic law intake -- The evolution of complicity as a construction for dealing with collective criminality -- Complicity in the jurisprudence of the ad hoc tribunals and hybrid courts -- Complicity and the hierarchy of the participation modes at the icc -- Complicity in international criminal law and law of state responsibility : comparative analysis -- Correlation between complicity and sentencing -- Conclusion : the place of complicity in international criminal law
In: Georgia State University Law Review, Band 33
SSRN
In: Studies in International & Comparative Criminal Law 2
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 44, Heft 2, S. 466-479
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: Law in context
Introduction -- The comparative legal method -- Common law and civil law -- Mapping the world's legal systems -- The diffusion of legal traditions -- Postmodern comparative law -- Socio-legal comparative law -- Numerical comparative law -- Empirical comparative law -- Legal transplants and convergence -- Comparative regional and international law -- From transnational law to global law -- Comparative law and development -- Implicit comparative law -- Reflections and outlook.
The application of the comparative method to the study of two or more legal systems has led a jaded existence in the Soviet Union, for a variety of reasons. As a technique of inquiry, it has been acceptable only insofar as its utilization conforms to the general methodology of dialectical and historical materialism: "It is wrong to think," a Soviet jurist has argued, "that research procedures make up a series of instruments that, from an ideological and political point of view, are neutral."' Marxist jurists consequently have no sympathy for the view that ''comparison" is some type of "objective" or truly "scientific" method, nor, in common with the overwhelming majority of western comparatists, do they look upon comparative law as an autonomous branch of jurisprudence.
BASE
In: Common market law review, Band 29, S. 29-70
ISSN: 0165-0750
In: SpringerBriefs in Law
Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. The making of criminal law as an element of ius puniendi -- Chapter 3. Substantive criminal law in the normative approach -- Chapter 4. Non-state actors as law-makers -- Chapter 5. Regulation issued by the non-state actors. Chapter 6. Conflict of regulation-elements of norms -- Chapter 7. The regulation of non-state actors as elements of the domestic penal norms -- Chapter 8. Conclusions.