Employment Data and Social Impact Assessment
In: Evaluation and program planning: an international journal, Band 15, Heft 3, S. 219-225
ISSN: 0149-7189
716773 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Evaluation and program planning: an international journal, Band 15, Heft 3, S. 219-225
ISSN: 0149-7189
In: Understanding Research Methods; Public Administration and Public Policy, S. 65-82
In: New perspectives on anthropological and social demography
In: SpringerLink
In: Bücher
This book focuses on quantitative survey methodology, data collection and cleaning methods. Providing starting tools for using and analyzing a file once a survey has been conducted, it addresses fields as diverse as advanced weighting, editing, and imputation, which are not well-covered in corresponding survey books. Moreover, it presents numerous empirical examples from the author's extensive research experience, particularly real data sets from multinational surveys
In: State politics & policy quarterly: the official journal of the State Politics and Policy Section of the American Political Science Association, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 84-89
ISSN: 1532-4400
The need to develop a system of collecting & circulating data concerning state politics is articulated. Although data regarding state politics have become more available during the late 20th century, it is argued that methods for collocating & disseminating such data remain inadequate. Three problems that have arisen from this failure to properly categorize state politics data are identified, eg, using informal networks for gathering information may reduce the empirical quality of state politics data. Consequently, it is announced that the journal State Politics & Policy Quarterly has initiated measures to periodically inform scholars about existing state politics data, especially from sources available via the Internet. Short synopses of the content of several Web sites that have state politics data readily available are also provided. 3 References. J. W. Parker
In: Translating Statistics to Make Decisions, S. 33-46
Statistical surveys represent an important source of scientific knowledge and a valid decision support tool in many fields, from social studies to economics, market research, health studies, and others. Scientists have tackled most of the methodological issues concerning surveys and the scientific literature offers excellent proposals for planning and conducting surveys. Nevertheless, surveys often require the achievement of aims that either deviate from the methodology or do not have a specific solution at all. This book focuses on survey theory and applications, providing insight and innovative solutions to face problems in data collection and integration, complex sample design, opinion questionnaire design, and statistical estimation. Formal rigour and simple language, together with real-life examples, will make the book suitable to both practitioners involved in applied research and to academics interested in scientific developments in the survey field
In: French politics, Band 1, Heft 3, S. 377-387
ISSN: 1476-3427
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies
"Ethnoreligious Data Collection" published on by Oxford University Press.
In: Development Southern Africa, Band 18, Heft 4, S. 525-535
ISSN: 1470-3637
In: Political analysis: PA ; the official journal of the Society for Political Methodology and the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, Band 11, Heft 3, S. 289-301
ISSN: 1476-4989
In public opinion research, response latency is a measure of attitude accessibility, which is the ease or swiftness with which an attitude comes to mind when a respondent is presented with a survey question. Attitude accessibility represents the strength of the association in memory between an attitude object and an evaluation of the object. Recent research shows that attitude accessibility, as measured by response latency, casts light on a wide range of phenomena of public opinion and political behavior. We discuss response latency methodology for survey research and advocate the use of latent response latency timers (which are invisible both to respondents and interviewers) as a low cost, low-maintenance alternative to traditional methods of measuring response latency in public opinion surveys. We show that with appropriate model specification latent response latency timers may provide a suitable alternative to the more complicated and expensive interviewer-activated timers.
In: Science & public policy: SPP ; journal of the Science Policy Foundation, Band 17, Heft 1, S. 35-44
ISSN: 0302-3427, 0036-8245