Virginity and patriarchy
In: Women's studies international forum, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 183-191
4490 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Women's studies international forum, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 183-191
In: Al-Raida Journal, S. 15
In this article I will discuss the romantic behavior of an Arab woman by analyzing the lyrics of two love songs and by studying the effects of such songs on both males and females.
In: Nature, society, and thought: NST ; a journal of dialectical and historical materialism, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 252-257
ISSN: 0890-6130
In: Feminist theory: an international interdisciplinary journal, Band 22, Heft 2, S. 165-189
ISSN: 1741-2773
This article discusses the resurgence of the term 'patriarchy' in digital culture and reflects on the everyday online meanings of the term in distinction to academic theorisations. In the 1960s–1980s, feminists theorised patriarchy as the systematic oppression of women, with differing approaches to how it worked. Criticisms that the concept was unable to account for intersectional experiences of oppression, alongside the 'turn to culture', resulted in a fall from academic grace. However, 'patriarchy' has found new life through Internet memes (humorous, mutational images that circulate widely on social media). This article aims to investigate the resurgence of the term 'patriarchy' in digital culture. Based on an analysis of memes with the phrase 'patriarchy' and 'smash the patriarchy', we identify how patriarchy memes are used by two different online communities (feminists and anti-feminists) and consider what this means for the ongoing usefulness of the concept of patriarchy. We argue that, whilst performing important community-forming work, using the term is a risky strategy for feminists for two reasons: first, because memes are by their nature brief, there is little opportunity to address intersections of oppression; secondly, the underlying logic of feminism is omitted in favour of brevity, leaving it exposed to being undermined by the more mainstream logic of masculinism.
In: Women's studies international forum, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 57-63
In: Studies on South East Europe 7
"Since the second half of the 1980s social movements, which questioned the legitimacy of the hitherto seemingly stable systems of Kemalist Turkey and socialist Balkans, won ground. Political Islam shuck Turkey; in the Balkan socialist countries the dams broke, and parliamentary democracies replaced monolithic socialist regimes. These processes have not been gender neutral. Therefore the central question is - after the abolition of patriarchy and the official installation of gender equality - are patriarchy and female discrimination returning in the region through the backdoor, although in a modernized version?"--BOOK JACKET
In: Hypatia: a journal of feminist philosophy, Band 26, Heft 1, S. 1-21
ISSN: 1527-2001
Why does the world have the pattern of patriarchy it currently possesses? Why have patriarchal practices and institutions evolved and changed in the ways they have tended to over time in human societies? This paper explores these general questions by integrating a feminist analysis of patriarchy with the central insights of the functionalist interpretation of historical materialism advanced by G. A. Cohen. The paper has two central aspirations: first, to help narrow the divide between analytical Marxism and feminism by redressing the former's neglect of the important role female labor has played, and continues to play, in shaping human history. Second, by developing the functionalist account of historical materialism in order to take patriarchy seriously, we can derive useful insights for diagnosing the emancipatory challenges that women face in the world today. The degree and form of patriarchy present in any particular society is determined by the productive forces it has had at its disposal. According to historical materialism, technological, material, and medical advances that ease the pressures on high fertility rates (such as the sanitation revolution, vaccinations, birth control, and so on) are the real driving forces behind the positive modulations to patriarchy witnessed in the twentieth century.
This is a video of Joan Tronto's Keynote address at the Sexual Contract: 30 Years On conference held at the School of Law and Politics, Cardiff University on 10-11 May 2018.In her address, Tronto begins with Carole Pateman's insight in The Sexual Contract (1988) about the incapacity of contract to produce freedom and equality, and considers the possibilities for an alternative organisation of human relations based on care ethics. She observes that in the years since the publication of The Sexual Contract, neoliberalism has resulted in a rewriting of the sexual contract. Under neoliberalism, the entry of women into the labour market, the full commodification of women's work and increasing economic disparities between men have resulted in some women becoming 'honorary individuals', substantially autonomous of men, with the consequent disruption of both men's political and sexual domination of women. This process has, in turn, given rise to a violent, misogynist and antidemocratic backlash in the form of neopopulism, in which men who have lost out economically feel a sense of deprivation, blame women, and seek a return to earlier forms of patriarchal domination. Against this background, she argues, care ethics provides a means of rethinking democratic commitments. A more just allocation of caring responsibilities could lead to a caring democracy without a return to gender subordination.
BASE
The puzzle -- The first clue : an association to loss -- Resistance -- Loss -- The three discoveries -- A summary -- Knowing this, then what? -- Finding resonance, repairing ruptures -- Leaving patriarchy -- Where then do we stand?
In: Politics, Band 10, Heft Apr 90
ISSN: 0263-3957
Pateman's The Sexual Contract advances 2 related assertions: that modern patriarchy takes contractual form and that contract relations are inherently patriarchal; thereby implying that the social contract is simultaneously a sexual contract. Criticises Pateman for dealing with possessive individualism in 'kettle logic' terms and argues that the book fails to demonstrate the contractual foundations of modern patriarchy. Includes Pateman's reply. (SJK)
In: Immigration and Contemporary British Theater
This book reviews the achievements of American women in the American economy, education, government, religion, the military, law enforcement, and communications. The author predicts the feminization of American life with particular reference to changes in the American family and the ever increasing dominance of women in all American institutions.