Suchergebnisse

In the past century, veterans of America's wars have shown extraordinary human longevity in the postwar eras. As a result, contemporary public historical interpretations of the American second world war experience have been influenced by veterans' perceptions of historical issues for a longer time than was true of postwar eras before the twentieth centuıy. Public historical debates in the United States have recently focused on the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor (1941) and the American attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (1945). These events may seem quite dated by now, but they have remarkable contemporary resonance in light of debates over proliferation of nuclear weapons and tactics of so-called pre-emptive warfare. Though the aerial attacks are often related in popular American perception, the truth is they were incommensurate events in terms of their military and political objectives, their physical scale and results, and the natures of their targets. ; II. Dünya Savaşı gazileri, bu savaşın en önemli iki olayında halk hissiyatında büyük bir yer tutmuşlardır: 1941'deki Japonların Pearl Harbor ve Amerika'nın 1945'deki Hiroşima saldırıları. Bu çalışma, II. Dünya savaş döneminden itibaren bu iki saldırının Amerikan kamu oyunda bir benzeri olup olmadığını inceler. Bu karşılaştırmada; 1) Japon ve Amerikan saldırılarının amaçları; 2) bu saldırıların boyutları; 3) bu saldırıların şekli irdelenmektedir. Ancak, tam bir karşılaştırma yapmak olanaksızdır. İronik olarak, Amerika yeni küçük bir nükleer silah geliştirmeyi düşünürken, Japon hükümeti, Pearl Harbor saldırısında olduğu gibi, potansiyel Kuzey Kore saldırısı korkusuyla caydırıcı nükleer programı planlamaktadır.

The word ultimatum is used repeatedly in the Report of the Army Pearl Harbor Board and in the testimony given to the Joint Congressional Committee investigating the Pearl Harbor disaster. In the former it is asserted that the Japanese regarded the "Ten Points" submitted to their government on November 26, 1941, as an ultimatum, and the testimony of Ambassador Grew is cited in support of the statement.

At precisely 7:55 a.m., Sunday, December 7, 1941, the Japanese launched a devastating air attack on Hawaii, leaving 2403 Americans dead, eight battleships crippled or destroyed, and 188 planes demolished. "The worse disaster in the military annals of the United States," in the words of a noted historian, plunged America into a global war and permanently changed the country. Isolationism was dead. Americans were united to win the war, and they were resolved never again to be caught by surprise. At the same time, they wanted to know why the Army and Navy were caught napping. Thus began a years-long search for scapegoats, a search which would lead to much confusion, bitter controversy, and the sensational charge that President Franklin Roosevelt had prior knowledge of the Japanese attack.

Introduction: December 7/8, 1941 / Beth Bailey and David Farber -- Prologue: The attacks of December 7/8 / Beth Bailey -- The attack on Pearl Harbor ... and Guam, Wake Island, Philippines, Thailand, Malaya, Singapore, and Hong Kong : December 7/8, the Pacific world, American empire, and the American political imaginary / Beth Bailey and David Farber -- "American lives" : Pearl Harbor and war in the US empire / Daniel Immerwahr -- Japan and the "spirit of December 8" / Jeremy A. Yellen -- Popular Japanese responses to the Pearl Harbor attack, December 8, 1941, to January 8, 1942 / Samuel Hideo Yamashita -- Identities and alliances : China's place in the world after Pearl Harbor, 1941-1945 / Rana Mitter -- Worldly medicine in wartime China : an exploration of Pearl Harbor's unintended consequences / Nicole Elizabeth Barnes -- Pearl Harbor and the Asian cultural turn / Ethan Mark -- The Philippines and the politics of anticipation / Christopher Capozzola -- Pearl Harbor and Australia's war in the Pacific / Kate Darian-Smith -- Tolerance, reconciliation, and alliance of hope : Pearl Harbor narratives in Japan / Yujin Yaguchi.