Nikolai Bukharin On Economic Imperialism
In: Review of radical political economics, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 3-12
ISSN: 1552-8502
50991 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Review of radical political economics, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 3-12
ISSN: 1552-8502
In: Review of radical political economics, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 74-79
ISSN: 1552-8502
In: History of political economy, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 237-255
ISSN: 1527-1919
In: Fiscaoeconomia: FSECON : international journal of political economics, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 1-19
ISSN: 2564-7504
Imperialism from the 19th century onwards has occupied the agenda of various Global Political Economy Schools, especially Marxism. Marxist imperialism theories has developed in three waves. In this study, firstly, the first wave theorists of imperialism (Hilferding, Lenin, Bukharin, Luxembourg) will be discussed. Then the second wave theorists Baran, Sweezy and Amin's theories of imperialism will be examined. Finally, within the framework of the third wave imperialism theories the views of Harvey, Foster and Magdoff will be addressed.
In: Survival: global politics and strategy, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 86-89
ISSN: 1468-2699
In: Survival: global politics and strategy, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 86
ISSN: 0039-6338
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 29, Heft 4, S. 431
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Contexts / American Sociological Association: understanding people in their social worlds, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 8-13
ISSN: 1537-6052
In this article, we consider how youth ages 14 to 24 years from diverse backgrounds understand and experience race. Through an analysis of open-ended survey questions collected as part of the national MyVoice Project, we explore youths' views on the role race plays in their own lives and contemporary society more broadly. Our results highlight clear patterns by race/ethnicity linked to commonly held racial stereotypes that affect youth in distinct ways, but also a broadly shared desire to take action to address racism and racial injustice.
In: Shakaigaku hyōron: Japanese sociological review, Band 56, Heft 1, S. 55-73
ISSN: 1884-2755
In: Peace research: the Canadian journal of peace and conflict studies, Band 34, Heft 1, S. 69-74
ISSN: 0008-4697
In: Journal of social sciences: interdisciplinary reflection of contemporary society, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 99-101
ISSN: 2456-6756
In: National Institute economic review: journal of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, Band 134, S. 86-92
ISSN: 1741-3036
North American, and in particular US views of 1992 must be seen in the broad political context of transatlantic relations. The US has shown consistent support for the idea of European integration. Initially this took the form of linking Marshall aid to greater European economic cooperation, then organised by the Organisation for European Economic Cooperation (OEEC). There was also strong political support for Monnet's supranational approach to European integration as a means of helping to bring about Franco-German reconciliation and to stabilise Europe. In the early days of European integration there were strategic and political reasons for American concerns to see a stronger (Western) Europe. The possible adverse effects of economic integration for the US were seen as more than manageable, given the strength of the US economy in relation to those of the European countries. With the promise of enhanced markets for US exports and US production the creation of the EEC was seen as being trade creating rather than trade diverting.
In: International journal / Canadian Institute of International Affairs, Band 21, Heft 3, S. 366-370
ISSN: 2052-465X
In: The review of politics, Band 13, S. 211
ISSN: 0034-6705
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Band 4, Heft 3, S. 153-165