Theories of Democratic Network Governance
In: European political science: EPS ; serving the political science community ; a journal of the European Consortium for Political Research, Band 7, Heft 4, S. 460-471
ISSN: 1680-4333
115 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: European political science: EPS ; serving the political science community ; a journal of the European Consortium for Political Research, Band 7, Heft 4, S. 460-471
ISSN: 1680-4333
In: European political science: EPS ; serving the political science community ; a journal of the European Consortium for Political Research, Band 7, Heft 4, S. 460-471
ISSN: 1680-4333
In: European political science: EPS ; serving the political science community ; a journal of the European Consortium for Political Research, Band 7, Heft 4, S. 460-471
ISSN: 1680-4333
In: European political science: EPS ; serving the political science community ; a journal of the European Consortium for Political Research, Band 7, Heft 4, S. 460-471
ISSN: 1680-4333
In: French politics, culture and society, Band 19, Heft 1, S. 134-138
ISSN: 1537-6370, 0882-1267
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 103, Heft 2, S. 359-390
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 100, Heft 2, S. 533-535
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 94, Heft 6, S. 1526-1528
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: Routledge Critical Studies in Public Management
While innovation has long been a major topic of research and scholarly interest for the private sector, it is still an emerging theme in the field of public management. While 'results-oriented' public management may be here to stay, scholars and practitioners are now shifting their attention to the process of management and to how the public sector can create 'value'.One of the urgent needs addressed by this book is a better specification of the institutional and political requirements for sustaining a robust vision of public innovation, through the key dimensions of collaboration, creative pr
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Band 29, Heft 1
ISSN: 1708-3087
In: Political studies: the journal of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom, Band 71, Heft 1, S. 69-88
ISSN: 1467-9248
How effective are different political institutions, policy-making processes and policies when it comes to mediating, mitigating and managing vertical and horizontal political tensions caused by disruptive societal challenges and political polarization? The present crisis for liberal democracy places this question high on the research agenda. A concept of political robustness is helpful for identifying the properties of political systems with a strong capacity for coping with political instability and conflict. This article defines political robustness, draws the contours of a conceptual framework for analysis of the political robustness of political systems and applies it illustratively to the political robustness of liberal democracies. We propose that the robustness of a political system depends on how much those who voice political demands—which differs greatly over time and between regimes—are involved in aggregating and integrating political demands into binding decisions.
In: Policy & politics, Band 49, Heft 2, S. 211-230
ISSN: 1470-8442
This article has three objectives. The first is to show that while co-production was originally tied to service production, co-creation has broader applications in the field of public governance and involves a broader range of actors and activities. The second objective is to demonstrate how the co-creation concept both builds on and extends the concept of collaborative governance, thus adding new dimensions to an already well-established literature. The final objective is to show how a strategic turn to co-creation introduces a new type of 'generative governance' aimed at solving complex problems by constructing platforms enabling the formation of arenas for co-creation that bring together a plethora of public and private actors, including citizens, in creative problem-solving processes. The three objectives are achieved through prospective theoretical analysis aimed at providing a conceptual foundation for analysing cutting-edge societal developments that are not yet commonplace.
In: Torfing , J & Ansell , C 2021 , ' Co-creation : the new kid on the block in public governance ' , Policy and Politics , vol. 49 , no. 2 , pp. 211-230 . https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321x16115951196045
This article has three objectives. The first is to show that while co-production was originally tied to service production, co-creation has broader applications in the field of public governance and involves a broader range of actors and activities. The second objective is to demonstrate how the co-creation concept both builds on and extends the concept of collaborative governance, thus adding new dimensions to an already well-established literature. The final objective is to show how a strategic turn to co-creation introduces a new type of 'generative governance' aimed at solving complex problems by constructing platforms enabling the formation of arenas for co-creation that bring together a plethora of public and private actors, including citizens, in creative problem-solving processes. The three objectives are achieved through prospective theoretical analysis aimed at providing a conceptual foundation for analysing cutting-edge societal developments that are not yet commonplace.
BASE
In: European policy analysis: EPA, Band 6, Heft 1, S. 119-119
ISSN: 2380-6567
In: Public administration: an international journal, Band 98, Heft 1, S. 261-276
ISSN: 1467-9299
AbstractAlthough not as eye‐catching as their business counterparts, many public and private institutions are currently experimenting with using platforms as a strategy of governance. Governance platforms are now being constructed by a wide array of actors at different geographical scales and across a wide range of issue areas. Although often enabled by digital technology, governance platforms fundamentally embody a new organizing logic to achieve distributed participation and mobilization. While private platforms are transforming the way that companies create and market their products or services and shifting the fundamental logic of how value is produced and appropriated, can this powerful organizing logic be harnessed for public as well as private purposes? We investigate how governance platforms generate powerful effects and survey the extant literature on governance platforms. We conclude that governance platforms do demonstrate promise, although they face a number of challenges.