Central Control of Local Authorities in Ireland
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 190
ISSN: 1540-6210
70 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 190
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: National municipal review, Band 29, Heft 10, S. 660-666
In: The review of politics, Band 2, Heft 3, S. 367-369
ISSN: 1748-6858
In: National municipal review, Band 29, Heft 2, S. 103-144
In: National municipal review, Band 28, Heft 3, S. 234-237
In: National municipal review, Band 28, Heft 2, S. 134-142
In: American political science review, Band 33, Heft 1, S. 108-109
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: Political science quarterly: a nonpartisan journal devoted to the study and analysis of government, politics and international affairs ; PSQ, Band 53, Heft 4, S. 516-532
ISSN: 1538-165X
In: American political science review, Band 32, Heft 2, S. 353-355
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 31, Heft 6, S. 1050-1070
ISSN: 1537-5943
The system of government set up under the Irish constitution of 1922 was of the parliamentary type. Provision was made for an Executive Council, some members of which were responsible to Dáil Eireann. The actual working executive was the president of the Executive Council. The old constitution also contemplated a group of expert ministers who should be heads of departments, but who should not share in the collective responsibility of the Executive Council to the Dáil. The appointment of such a group of "extern" ministers was not made mandatory. In the first Dáil, three extern ministers were appointed, and in the second Dáil a fourth was added. This constitutional arrangement, the inspiration for which was derived from the Swiss executive, did not last long. The extern ministers were, as a matter of fact, active politicians; they were not appointed on the basis of merit in heading the specific departments; in 1927, an amendment was adopted which practically abolished extern ministries; and the Free State has since proceeded on the general plan of a cabinet collectively responsible to the Dáil.
In: American political science review, Band 31, Heft 5, S. 842-861
ISSN: 1537-5943
Under terms of the Treaty of 1921 between Great Britain and Ireland, it was agreed that: "Ireland shall have the same constitutional status in the Community of Nations known as the British Empire as the Dominion of Canada, the Commonwealth of Australia, the Dominion of New Zealand, and the Union of South Africa, with a Parliament having powers to make laws for the peace, order and good government of Ireland and an Executive responsible to that Parliament, and shall be styled and known as the Irish Free State." The status of the Irish Free State was further defined by this language: "Subject to the provisions hereinafter set out, the position of the Irish Free State in relation to the Imperial Parliament and Government and otherwise shall be that of the Dominion of Canada, and the law, practice and constitutional usage governing the relationship of the Crown or the representative of the Crown and of the Imperial Parliament to the Dominion of Canada shall govern their relationship to the Irish Free State." The Imperial Government gave this treaty the force of law by the Irish Free State (Agreement) Act of March 31, 1922. To implement the treaty, Dáil Eireann, sitting as a constituent assembly, enacted a constitution for the Irish Free State in 1922. This constitution declared: "The Irish Free State (otherwise hereinafter called or sometimes called Saorstát Eireann) is a co-equal member of the Community of Nations forming the British Commonwealth of Nations." It was given the force of law by the Imperial Government in the Irish Free State Constitution Act of December 5, 1922.
In: National municipal review, Band 26, Heft 2, S. 71-76
In: National municipal review, Band 25, Heft 10, S. 585-588
AbstractMeasuring its cost against value received, shall we sav the money spent in township operation?
In: American political science review, Band 30, Heft 1, S. 102-104
ISSN: 1537-5943
During the first five months of 1935, interest in local governmental problems in Michigan was centered in the regular session of the legislature. The 1935 session should be congratulated on letting some measures lie fallow in committee and on defeating others. Among these bills were several which would have played havoc with the operation of the general property tax in local units. They would have provided for the blanket cancellation of delinquent taxes and for broad exemptions from the property tax. It was the defeat of such proposals rather than any positive program that redounds to the credit of the legislature.
In: American political science review, Band 30, Heft 1, S. 181-182
ISSN: 1537-5943