BOOK REVIEWS: 'Russia - Lost in Translation: The Yeltsin and Putin Legacies' by Lilia Shevtsova
In: Democratization, Band 15, Heft 4, S. 838-840
ISSN: 1351-0347
46 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Democratization, Band 15, Heft 4, S. 838-840
ISSN: 1351-0347
In: Democratization, Band 15, Heft 4, S. 838-841
ISSN: 1351-0347
In: Europe Asia studies, Band 60, Heft 6, S. 989-1010
ISSN: 0966-8136
In: Europe Asia studies, Band 59, Heft 2, S. 279-302
ISSN: 1465-3427
In: Perspectives on European politics and society, Band 8, Heft 4, S. 439-459
ISSN: 1568-0258
In: Europe Asia studies, Band 59, Heft 2, S. 279-302
ISSN: 0966-8136
In: Perspectives on European politics and society: journal of intra-European dialogue, Band 8, Heft 4, S. 439-459
ISSN: 1570-5854
In: The journal of communist studies & transition politics, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 457-484
ISSN: 1743-9116
In: The Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 457-484
The cancellation of gubernatorial elections in Russia was aimed at tightening the central grip over the regions & checking the influence of regional elites at the sub-national level. These policies represented a logical continuation to centralizing reforms launched by President Putin upon his accession to power in March 2000. However, the results of the enactment of the new system were rather different, inadvertently leading to the emergence of decentralizing trends & changing the political dynamics at the regional level. These unexpected trends may disrupt the previous relationship between the centre & the regions & create more problems for the Kremlin in the longer term than it can resolve. Tables. Adapted from the source document.
In: The journal of communist studies and transition politics, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 457-484
ISSN: 1352-3279
In: Europe Asia studies, Band 57, Heft 7, S. 933-949
ISSN: 1465-3427
In: Europe Asia studies, Band 57, Heft 7, S. 933-950
ISSN: 0966-8136
In: Innovations in international affairs
"This timely and original volume fill the gaps in the existing theoretical and philosophical literature on international relations by problematizing civilization as a new unit of research in global politics. It interrogates to what extent and in what ways civilization is becoming a strategic frame of reference in the current world order. The book complements and advances the existing field of study previously dominated by other approaches - economic, national, class-based, racial, and colonial - and tests its key philosophical suppositions against countries that exhibit civilizational ambitions. The authors are all leading international scholars in the fields of political theory, IR, cultural analysis, and area studies who deal with various aspects of the civilizational arena. Offering key chapters on ideology, multipolarity, modernity, liberal democracy, and capitalism, this book extends the existing methodological, theoretical, and empirical debates for IR and area studies scholars globally. It will be of great interest to politicians, public opinion makers, and all those concerned with the evolution of world affairs"--
In: Političeskie issledovanija: Polis ; naučnyj i kul'turno-prosvetitel'skij žurnal = Political studies, S. 8-13
ISSN: 1684-0070
The collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the twentieth century ended the pre-existing bipolar Cold War system and resulted in a unipolar moment in which the United States enjoyed a position of almost unchallenged global and civilizational leadership [Krauthammer 1991; Waltz 1993; Wohlforth 1999]. However, despite the initial elation of some Western politicians and analysts [Fukuyama 1992; Brooks, Wohlforth 2008; Kagan 2008], who hoped to see the triumph of the Western idea universally, this situation was relatively short-lived. Global dialogue soon moved beyond this moment of unipolarity toward its more conventional form, in which states struggle for power and influence and search for areas of mutually beneficial co-operation. At the beginning of the third decade of the twenty-first century, we see a qualitatively different world. There have been profound political changes since the post-Cold War unipolarity. In this world, the idea of civilization has become a virtual currency of international relations and global dialogue. Many analysts [Coker 2019; Acharya 2020; Stuenkel 2016; Higgott 2019] discuss the rise of civilizations in world affairs as the new sociopolitical reality. Countries such as Russia, China, India, Turkey, and Brazil are often considered civilizational states – challengers to the West. Historically, philosophers have oscillated between the idea of multiple civilizations, with the West being one civilization of many (Spengler, Huntington, Danilevsky), and a single and universal Western civilization (Hayek, Kant). The former approach became a cardinal frame of reference of the global discourse during the past decade.
In: Političeskie issledovanija: Polis ; naučnyj i kul'turno-prosvetitel'skij žurnal = Political studies, S. 8-24
ISSN: 1684-0070
This paper examines the origins, nature, and potential outcomes of the global crisis induced by the Covid-19 pandemic. The authors argue that the crisis has been animated by the two most important groups of factors that have been simmering in the world's economic and political system during the past six decades and have been accelerated by the pandemic. First, the dynamic of the Covid-19 crisis illuminated the existing challenges of the contemporary capitalist system, which is generally legitimated via the instruments of moral panic and media manipulation. Each consecutive crisis of capitalism ends with the redistribution of power resources to some groups of participants. Second, the Covid-19 crisis has been taking place within the conditions of a systemic and ideological struggle between two global elite factions that harbour drastically different approaches to the changing world order and have different politico-economic goals and intentions. The authors will argue that the crisis will not change the world drastically, yet it will amplify these ongoing tensions, illuminate them to many general observers, and deepen the already-existing systemic instability.