Corporate Essence and Identity in Criminal Law
In: 154 J. Bus. Ethics 955 (2018)
81 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: 154 J. Bus. Ethics 955 (2018)
SSRN
SSRN
SSRN
SSRN
SSRN
In: 103 Iowa L. Rev. 507 (2018)
SSRN
In: 35 Sw. U. L. Rev. Vol. 327 (2006)
SSRN
Der Heidelberger Archäologe Prof. Panagiotopoulos berichtet in "Die Herren der Ringe lebten auf Kreta" auf Campus-TV über die Tonplomben aus der minoischen Kultur. Anhand dieser erläutert Prof. Panagiotopoulos die Bedeutung von Knossos im damaligen minoischen Reich als politisches Zentrum.
BASE
In: Eco-management and auditing, Band 6, Heft 1, S. 18-25
ISSN: 1099-0925
In: Eco-management and auditing, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 15-21
ISSN: 1099-0925
Corporate criminal justice rests on the fiction that corporations possess "minds" capable of instantiating culpable mens rea. The retributive and deterrent justifications for punishing criminal corporations are strongest when those minds are well-ordered. In such cases misdeeds are most likely to reflect malice, and sanctions are most likely to have their intended preventive benefits. But what if a corporate defendant's mind is disordered? Organizational psychology and economics have tools to identify normally functioning organizations that are fully accountable for the harms they cause. These disciplines can also diagnose dysfunctional organizations where the threads of accountability may have frayed and where sanctions would not deter. Punishing such corporations undermines the goals of criminal law, leaves victim interests unaddressed, and is unfair to corporate stakeholders. This Article argues that some corporate criminal defendants should be able to raise the insanity defense. Statutory text makes the insanity defense available to all qualifying defendants. When a corporate criminal defendant's mind is sufficiently disordered, basic criminal law purposes also support the defense. Corporate crime in these cases may trace to dysfunctional systems or subversive third parties rather than to corporate malice. For example, individual corporate employees may thwart well-meaning corporate policies to pursue personal advantage at the expense of the corporation itself. Corporations then may seem more like victims of their own misconduct rather than perpetrators of it. Justice and prevention favor treatment of insane corporations rather than punishment. Recognizing the corporate insanity defense would better serve victims' and stakeholders' interests in condemning and preventing corporate misconduct. Treatment would create an opportunity for government experts to reform dysfunctional corporations in a way that predominant modes of corporate punishment cannot. Effective reform takes victims seriously by minimizing the ...
BASE
In: Cambridge Handbook of Surveillance Law 420 (David Gray & Stephen E. Henderson eds. 2017)
SSRN
In: International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research, 7 (1), April 2014
SSRN
SSRN