Judgment Proofness and the Choice between Monetary and Nonmonetary Care
In: Journal of institutional and theoretical economics: JITE, Band 170, Heft 2, S. 249
ISSN: 1614-0559
96 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of institutional and theoretical economics: JITE, Band 170, Heft 2, S. 249
ISSN: 1614-0559
In: European economic review: EER, Band 65, S. 90-107
ISSN: 1873-572X
In: International review of law and economics, Band 35, S. 1-12
ISSN: 0144-8188
In: International review of law and economics, Band 35, S. 73-79
ISSN: 0144-8188
In: Journal of economics, Band 113, Heft 1, S. 79-95
ISSN: 1617-7134
SSRN
In: CESifo Working Paper Series No. 4225
SSRN
Working paper
In: Economics of governance, Band 13, Heft 3, S. 195-215
ISSN: 1435-8131
In: Environmental and resource economics, Band 53, Heft 1, S. 61-71
ISSN: 1573-1502
This paper investigates the influence of the political regime on the relative importance of conspicuous consumption. We use the separation of Germany into the communist GDR and the democratic FRG and its reunification in 1990 as a natural experiment. Relying on household data that are representative for Germany, our empirical results strongly indicate that conspicuous consumption is relatively more important in East Germany. Importantly, a significant gap in conspicuous consumption expenditures remains even 18 years after the reunification.
BASE
This paper investigates the influence of the political regime on the relative importance of conspicuous consumption. We use the separation of Germany into the communist GDR and the democratic FRG and its reunification in 1990 as a natural experiment. Relying on household data that are representative for Germany, our empirical results strongly indicate that conspicuous consumption is relatively more important in East Germany. Importantly, a significant gap in conspicuous consumption expenditures remains even 18 years after the reunification.
BASE
In: Public choice, Band 150, Heft 3-4, S. 499-510
ISSN: 1573-7101
Compensation schemes in which lawyer's fees are contingent on winning the suit are becoming increasingly popular throughout Europe. At the same time, the British rule of legal cost allocation is applicable in many European countries. As a result, it is of policy relevance how their coexistence may be harmonized. This paper uses the litigation-contest framework to analyze the consequences of three different cost-allocation regimes if a plaintiff's attorney is compensated on a contingent fee basis. We compare the equilibrium contest effort, justice, and payoffs for affected parties in the different regimes and find arguments in favor of not reimbursing contingent fees. Adapted from the source document.
In: CESifo Working Paper Series No. 3922
SSRN
Working paper
In: CESifo Working Paper Series No. 3888
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper