Linking the social, economic, and agroecological: a resilience framework for dairy farming
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Volume 26, Issue 1
ISSN: 1708-3087
59 results
Sort by:
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Volume 26, Issue 1
ISSN: 1708-3087
In: Public administration review: PAR, Volume 39, Issue 6, p. 598
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Public administration review: PAR, Volume 34, Issue 3, p. 189
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Public administration review: PAR, Volume 40, Issue 2, p. 202
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Environmental science & policy, Volume 121, p. 42-48
ISSN: 1462-9011
In: Environmental science & policy, Volume 94, p. 182-190
ISSN: 1462-9011
In: Public administration review: PAR, Volume 35, p. 567-602
ISSN: 0033-3352
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Volume 24, Issue 3
ISSN: 1708-3087
In: Public administration review: PAR, Volume 50, Issue 4, p. 470
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Volume 26, Issue 3
ISSN: 1708-3087
The concept of 'resilience' has recently gained traction in a range of contexts. Its various interpretations and framings are now used to examine a variety of issues, particularly relating to the human dimensions of global change. This can pose challenges to scholars, practitioners, and policy-makers seeking to develop focused research programmes, design targeted interventions, and communicate across disciplinary boundaries. The concept of resilience is widely used in Aotearoa-New Zealand, where it informs both government policy and research programmes. Resilience is particularly relevant in this small developed nation, which is heavily reliant on primary production in rural areas and affected by a range of geological and climatic hazards. To understand the range and extent of application of resilience in the rural context, we use systematic review methods to identify, characterise, and synthesise this knowledge base. Currently, research applying the concept of resilience in the rural context is limited in areal extent, largely quantitative in nature, and led by a small number of researchers. There is limited evidence of collaboration. Research has focused on a small number of hazards, failing to capture the diversity of risks and hazards in addition to their impacts. The results of our analysis and methodology offer important insights for meta-analyses of risk and hazard scholarship. The findings provide a baseline to track the future progress and effectiveness of resilience interventions and help inform current and future research priorities targeting persistent vulnerabilities in rural New Zealand and elsewhere. ; Peer Reviewed
BASE
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Volume 22, Issue 2
ISSN: 1708-3087
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/nnc1.cu50746855
At head of title: Department of the Interior. Bureau of Government Laboratories. ; "No. 35.-December, 1905." ; I. [without special title] -- II. Notes on Cuming's Philippine plants in the herbarium of the Bureau of government laboratories / by Elmer D. Merrill -- III. Notes on Philippine Gramineae / by E. Hackel -- IV. Scitamineae philippinenses / by H. N. Ridley -- V. Philippine Acanthaceae / by C. B. Clarke. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
Climate change poses a significant challenge to primary industries and adaptation will be required to reduce detrimental impacts and realise opportunities. Despite the breadth of information to support adaptation planning however, knowledge is fragmented, obscuring information needs, hampering strategic planning and constraining decision-making capacities. In this letter, we present and apply the Adaptation Knowledge Cycle (AKC), a heuristic for rapidly evaluating and systematising adaptation research by analytical foci: Impacts, Implications, Decisions or Actions. We demonstrate its application through an assessment of ten years' climate change adaptation research for New Zealand's primary industries. The letter draws on the results of systematic review, empirical analysis, workshops, interviews, narrative analyses and pathways planning to synthesise information and identify knowledge gaps. Results show the heuristic's simplicity is valuable for cross- and transdisciplinary communication on adaptation in New Zealand's primary industries. Results also provide insight into what we know and need to know with respect to undertaking adaptation planning. With the development of tools and processes to inform decision making under conditions of uncertainty—such as adaptation pathways—it is increasingly important to efficiently and accurately determine knowledge needs. The combination of systematic data collection techniques, and heuristics such as the AKC may provide researchers and stakeholders with an efficient, robust tool to review and synthesise existing knowledge, and identify emerging research priorities. Results can in turn support the design of targeted research and inform adaptation strategies for policy and practice.
BASE
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Volume 25, Issue 4
ISSN: 1708-3087