Charting the Roots of Anti-Chinese Populism in Africa: A Comparison of Zambia and Ghana
In: Journal of Asian and African studies: JAAS, Band 49, Heft 2, S. 129-147
ISSN: 1745-2538
36 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of Asian and African studies: JAAS, Band 49, Heft 2, S. 129-147
ISSN: 1745-2538
In: Journal of Asian and African studies: JAAS, Band 49, Heft 2, S. 129-147
ISSN: 1745-2538
In this article the authors conduct focused case studies on Zambia and Ghana to investigate the increasingly diverse popular reactions to Chinese engagement throughout the region of sub-Saharan Africa. In this effort they challenge the existing binary exploitation/opportunity paradigm through which growing Chinese engagement in sub-Saharan Africa is often analyzed. Instead, they propose an alternative framework, which centers less on the positive or nefarious nature of Chinese involvement and more on the institutional structures of African regimes. As opposed to closed autocracies and consolidated multiparty democracies, fluid transitional states create opportunities for the appearance of anti-Chinese populist movements akin to Michael Sata and the Patriotic Front in Zambia.
In: African and Asian studies: AAS, Band 9, Heft 3, S. 356-383
ISSN: 1569-2094
World Affairs Online
In: African and Asian studies: AAS, Band 9, Heft 3, S. 356-383
ISSN: 1569-2108
Abstract
The following paper examines the historical origins and development of China's advocacy of the principle of noninterference in its African foreign policy and suggests that in spite of its consistent rhetorical support for noninterference over the last fifty years, the relevance of the principle in shaping Beijing's foreign policy decisions has varied as its pragmatic interests have shifted. China's post-Maoist leadership, in the drive to win the African resources and markets needed to bolster its growing, export-driven economy, has utilized the practice of noninterference to win a foothold on the continent. As its level of investment in Africa and dependency on African energy resources and markets have expanded, however, Beijing has found limiting its actions vis-à-vis a policy of noninterference less tenable, and as recurrences of regional instability and anti-Chinese populism have threatened its interests, citizens, and assets on the continent, will likely take a more forceful role in its relations with partner states.
This collection examines the political logic of the ongoing trade war between the United States and China. The contributors examine a number of theories behind the trade war, the historical background in which the trade war emerged, and the international contexts.
In: The Brookings review, Band 15, Heft 1, S. 42