Two Hundred Years of Say's Law: Essays on Economic Theory's Most Controversial Principle
In: History of political economy, Band 37, Heft 2, S. 382-385
ISSN: 1527-1919
114 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: History of political economy, Band 37, Heft 2, S. 382-385
ISSN: 1527-1919
In: History of political economy, Band 36, Heft 2, S. 403-405
ISSN: 1527-1919
In: Cahiers d'économie politique, Band 38, Heft 1, S. 11-23
La relation entre Malthus et Ricardo est une façon d'aborder le problème de la place de Malthus au sein de l'école classique. Je ne trouve pas qu'il y a des différences substantielles à propos de la valeur ou de la théorie de la croissance. La politique démographique de Malthus était dirigée contre l'idéologie des classes supérieures, des militaires et de l'Église, et Ricardo partageait cette position. Certes, une différence analytique majeure sous-tend l'idée de Malthus, selon laquelle l'agriculture a une productivité supérieure, comme le supposait la théorie physiocratique du surplus. Toutefois, Malthus abandonna son protectionnisme en faveur de l'agriculture, autrement toute notion d'une doctrine classique unifiée aurait été impossible. Enfin, les conceptions de Malthus à propos de la politique monétaire et fiscale, étonnamment orthodoxes, en dépit du problème de la demande agrégée, réduisent encore un peu plus l'écart entre lui et Ricardo.
In: History of political economy, Band 32, Heft 2, S. 187-232
ISSN: 1527-1919
In: The European journal of the history of economic thought, Band 6, Heft 4, S. 523-551
ISSN: 1469-5936
In: Journal of the history of economic thought, Band 20, Heft 3, S. 253-277
ISSN: 1469-9656
Ricardo "and his chief followers … did not express their meaning with sufficient clearness, and they have been misunderstood by all but the most careful readers" (Marshall, 1920, p. 84)."Ricardo … has not been fortunate in finding careful students" (Cairnes, 1874, p. 237).
In: The European journal of the history of economic thought, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 430-436
ISSN: 1469-5936
In: History of political economy, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 335-341
ISSN: 1527-1919
In: History of economics review, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 127-128
ISSN: 1838-6318
In: History of political economy, Band 27, Heft 3, S. 531-537
ISSN: 1527-1919
In: History of political economy, Band 27, Heft 1, S. 167-171
ISSN: 1527-1919
In: Journal of the history of economic thought, Band 17, Heft 2, S. 285-306
ISSN: 1469-9656
I can conceive of few academics presumptuous or foolhardy enough to write an "intellectual autobiography" unless invited to do so. It is no easy assignment. One seeks to protect a core of privacy; there is a residual subjectivity regarding events and persons that cannot be eliminated; one is obliged to tone things down for practical reasons. Even if one can hope to tell the "truth" it will not be the whole truth—certainly not in twenty-two pages. It must also be said that any linkages that might be suggested between character or experience and professional contribution (and an intellectual autobiography of course seeks out such linkages) can never progress beyond the stages of hypothesis; neither necessary nor sufficient causation is at issue. Yet I myself have learned something from this exercise; perhaps my readers will too.
In: History of political economy, Band 26, Heft 3, S. 487-499
ISSN: 1527-1919
In: Journal of the history of economic thought, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 159-161
ISSN: 1469-9656
In: Journal of the history of economic thought, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 322-325
ISSN: 1469-9656