Diversity of incentives for private forest landowners: An assessment of programs in Indiana, USA
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 23, Heft 4, S. 542-550
ISSN: 0264-8377
64 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 23, Heft 4, S. 542-550
ISSN: 0264-8377
In: Land use policy, Band 23, Heft 4, S. 542-550
ISSN: 0264-8377
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Band 11, Heft 1
ISSN: 1708-3087
Metadata only record ; This paper presents a framework for the analysis of socio-ecological systems and some of its various components, such as resources, resource users, public infrastructure providers, and public infrastructure. The principles that this model was based off of were initially conceived because of a need to understand robust, common-pool resources. The SES framework is available to researchers of all disciplines to enable them to analyze the components of SES and the links between the components. The primary focus of this article is to address how institutional arrangements can affect the robustness of SES. ; Available in SANREM office, FS
BASE
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Band 9, Heft 1
ISSN: 1708-3087
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 5, Heft 3, S. 221-231
ISSN: 1462-9011
In: Society and Natural Resources, Band 20, S. 307-322
SSRN
In: The journal of mathematical sociology, Band 41, Heft 1, S. 26-45
ISSN: 1545-5874
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Band 20, Heft 4
ISSN: 1708-3087
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Band 17, Heft 2
ISSN: 1708-3087
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Band 20, Heft 3
ISSN: 1708-3087
In: Proceedings of the Agent 2002 Conference on Social Agent: Ecology, Exchange, and Evolution
SSRN
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Band 140, S. 105374
In: Environmental Research Letters https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac30f7
SSRN
In: Environmental Research Letters, Band 16, S. 1-12
This study argues that scholars and policy-makers need to understand environmental activists better to bridge the gap between growing activism and policy. Conventional wisdom is that environmental activists generally support stronger climate policies. But there is still little understanding about diversity of views within activist groups when it comes to specific policies, and existing studies indicate that their views are not uniform, which can weaken their impact as a group. Activists might unite to demand change, but not necessarily agree on details of the desired change. Exploring the differences within the group, this paper focuses on how to nudge those who already share favorable attitudes towards policies that mitigate climate change. The motivation has been to see, in presence of general support for stronger environmental policies, whether this support could be channeled into more specific policies. We first take on a methodological challenge to construct an index of environmental predisposition. Then drawing from existing social-behavioral scholarship, we analyze results of an experimental survey with select treatments previously reported as promising. In November and December 2019, we collected responses from 119 participants at the Fridays for Future demonstrations in Germany. The results indicate that there are indeed important differences within the group, and nudging effects exist even in this rather strongly predisposed group, with participants assigned to the experimental group showing higher levels of support for the introduction of a carbon tax that is traditionally seen as a difficult policy to gain widespread public support. We find that those who score neither too high nor too low are more likely to respond to nudging. Yet, the effects vary for general outcomes such as policy support, behavioral intentions, and environmental citizenship. Overall, the findings show the value of understanding the heterogeneity of individual views within environmental movements better and directing interventions in large resource systems such as climate to specific issues and target groups for accelerating transformations towards sustainability.