Suchergebnisse

Contemporary Anglo-American political thought is witnessing a revival of theories of deliberative democracy. The principle of public argumentation, according to which the legitimation of a general norm is predicated upon a rational and open dialog among all those affected by this norm, constitutes their common underlying assumption. This assumption is itself grounded in the metatheoretical claim that arguing is the defining activity of a demos of free and equal members. Habermas' well-known formulation of communicative or discursive democracy represents one of the earliest, most discussed, and indeed most emblematic versions of the existing models of deliberative democracy. It is here, I believe, that Castoriadis' political theory can prove exceptionally important as it provides a starting point and a solid ground for articulating one of the most incisive and convincing critiques of the limits and flaws of communicative democracy. Although Castoriadis himself never directly discussed deliberative democracy as such, we can try to approximate from various parts of his work what he might have thought about, especially when it comes to Habermas' model.

Examines Cornelius Castoriadis's theory of autonomy, seen as largely overlooked in current political & philosophical debates, & asserts its value in contemporary political thought. The origins & evolution of Castoriadis's concept of autonomy are described, highlighting tensions between facticity & validity in this project. It is argued that Castoriadis's concepts represent an important, sustained, & ambitious effort to revive the concept of autonomy & the democratic project in the face of modernity & Marxism. Justifications for this argument are presented in analysis of his main themes on individual autonomy & the dialectical relation of instituting & instituted power in political autonomy. It is concluded that Castoriadis's theory, by recapturing the emancipatory content of modernity & renewing interest in postmetaphysical form of autonomous action, transcends the limitations of current debates & offers a new direction for political inquiry. T. Arnold