Between policy and science: research councils' responsiveness in Austria, Norway and Switzerland
In: Science and public policy: journal of the Science Policy Foundation, Band 34, Heft 6, S. 401-415
ISSN: 1471-5430
47 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Science and public policy: journal of the Science Policy Foundation, Band 34, Heft 6, S. 401-415
ISSN: 1471-5430
In: Science and public policy: journal of the Science Policy Foundation, Band 34, Heft 6, S. 401-415
ISSN: 1471-5430
In: Science and public policy: journal of the Science Policy Foundation, Band 34, Heft 6, S. 389-399
ISSN: 1471-5430
In: RESPOL-D-23-01711
SSRN
In: Science and public policy: journal of the Science Policy Foundation, Band 46, Heft 1, S. 105-115
ISSN: 1471-5430
Understanding knowledge co-creation in key emerging areas of European research is critical for policy makers wishing to analyze impact and make strategic decisions. However, purely data-driven methods for characterising policy topics have limitations relating to the broad nature of such topics and the differences in language and topic structure between the political language and scientific and technological outputs. In this paper, we discuss the use of ontologies and semantic technologies as a means to bridge the linguistic and conceptual gap between policy questions and data sources for characterising European knowledge production. Our experience suggests that the integration between advanced techniques for language processing and expert assessment at critical junctures in the process is key for the success of this endeavour.
BASE
In: Science and public policy: journal of the Science Policy Foundation, Band 36, Heft 9, S. 667-681
ISSN: 1471-5430
In: Economics of education review, Band 52, S. 91-104
ISSN: 0272-7757
In: Science and public policy: journal of the Science Policy Foundation, Band 34, Heft 6, S. 372-388
ISSN: 1471-5430
In: Reale , E , Avramov , D , Canhial , K , Donovan , C , Flecha , R , Holm , P , Larkin , C , Lepori , B , Mosoni-Fried , J , Oliver , E , Primeri , E , Puigvert , L , Scharnhorst , A , Schubert , A , Soler , M , Soòs , S , Sordé , T , Travis , C & Van Horik , R 2017 , ' A review of literature on evaluating the scientific, social and political impact of social sciences and humanities research ' , Research Evaluation , vol. 27 , no. 4 , pp. 298 . https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx025 , https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx025
Recently, the need to contribute to the evaluation of the scientific, social, and political impact of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) research has become a demand of policy makers and society. The international scientific community has made significant advances that have transformed the impact of evaluation landscape. This article reviews the existing scientific knowledge on evaluation tools and techniques that are applied to assess the scientific impact of SSH research; the changing structure of social and political impacts of SSH research is investigated based on an overarching research question: to what extent do scholars attempt to apply methods, instruments, and approaches that take into ac-count the distinctive features of SSH? The review also includes examples of European Union (EU) pro-jects that demonstrate these impacts. This article culminates in a discussion of the development of the assessment of different impacts and identifies limitations, and areas and topics to explore in the future.
BASE
Recently, the need to contribute to the evaluation of the scientific, social, and political impact of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) research has become a demand of policy makers and society. The international scientific community has made significant advances that have transformed the impact of evaluation landscape. This article reviews the existing scientific knowledge on evaluation tools and techniques that are applied to assess the scientific impact of SSH research; the changing structure of social and political impacts of SSH research is investigated based on an overarching research question: to what extent do scholars attempt to apply methods, instruments, and approaches that take into account the distinctive features of SSH? The review also includes examples of European Union (EU) projects that demonstrate these impacts. This article culminates in a discussion of the development of the assessment of different impacts and identifies limitations, and areas and topics to explore in the future.
BASE
Recently, the need to contribute to the evaluation of the scientific, social, and political impact of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) research has become a demand of policy makers and society. The international scientific community has made significant advances that have transformed the impact of evaluation landscape. This article reviews the existing scientific knowledge on evaluation tools and techniques that are applied to assess the scientific impact of SSH research; the changing structure of social and political impacts of SSH research is investigated based on an overarching research question: to what extent do scholars attempt to apply methods, instruments, and approaches that take into account the distinctive features of SSH? The review also includes examples of European Union (EU) projects that demonstrate these impacts. This article culminates in a discussion of the development of the assessment of different impacts and identifies limitations, and areas and topics to explore in the future.
BASE
In: Public management review, Band 17, Heft 10, S. 1444-31
ISSN: 1471-9037
In: Public management review, Band 17, Heft 10, S. 1444-1474
ISSN: 1471-9045
In: Research Policy, Band 40, Heft 1, S. 148-164