Suchergebnisse
Filter
82 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
Working paper
A Conditional Model of Opinion Assignment on the Supreme Court
In: Political research quarterly: PRQ ; official journal of the Western Political Science Association and other associations, Band 57, Heft 4, S. 551
ISSN: 1938-274X
A Conditional Model of Opinion Assignment on the Supreme Court
In: Political research quarterly: PRQ ; official journal of Western Political Science Association, Pacific Northwest Political Science Association, Southern California Political Science Association, Northern California Political Science Association, Band 57, Heft 4, S. 551-564
ISSN: 1065-9129
The Politics of Executive Orders: Legislative Constraints on Presidential Power
In: Political research quarterly: PRQ ; official journal of the Western Political Science Association and other associations, Band 52, Heft 4, S. 767
ISSN: 1938-274X
The Politics of Executive Orders: Legislative Constraints on Presidential Power
In: Political research quarterly: PRQ ; official journal of Western Political Science Association, Pacific Northwest Political Science Association, Southern California Political Science Association, Northern California Political Science Association, Band 52, Heft 4, S. 767-784
ISSN: 1065-9129
Competing Principals
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 60, Heft 3, S. 873
ISSN: 0022-3816
Strategic Policy Considerations and Voting Fluidity on the Burger Court
In: American political science review, Band 90, Heft 3, S. 581-592
ISSN: 1537-5943
Justices are strategic actors. This is particularly evident when they change their votes between the original conference on the merits and the Court's announcement of the final decision. We predict that such voting fluidity may be influenced by strategic policy considerations, justices' uncertainty over issues involved in a case, the chief justice's interest in protecting his prerogatives, and other institutional pressures. To test our hypotheses, we explore the occurrence of fluidity on the Burger Court (1969–85). Using logistic regression, we show that justices' decisions to change their votes stem primarily from strategic policy considerations. In limited instances, the decision to switch can be attributed to either uncertainty or institutional pressures. Our findings suggest that the decision of a justice to join an opinion results from more than his or her initial policy preferences; final votes are influenced as well by the politics of opinion writing.
Inside the U.S. Supreme Court: The Reliability of the Justices' Conference Records
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 58, Heft 2, S. 528-539
ISSN: 1468-2508
May It Please the Chief? Opinion Assignments in the Rehnquist Court
In: American journal of political science, Band 40, Heft 2, S. 421
ISSN: 1540-5907
Inside the U.S. Supreme Court: The Reliability of the Justices' Conference Records
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 58, Heft 2, S. 528-539
ISSN: 0022-3816
May It Please the Chief? Opinion Assignments in the Rehnquist Court
In: American journal of political science: AJPS, Band 40, Heft 2, S. 421-443
ISSN: 0092-5853
Principals, Goals, Dimensionality, and Congressional Committees
In: Legislative studies quarterly, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 457
ISSN: 1939-9162
Principals, Goals, Dimensionality, and Congressional Committees
In: Legislative studies quarterly, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 457-476
ISSN: 0362-9805
The Impact of Party Cues on Citizen Evaluations of Senators
In: Congress & the presidency, Band 38, Heft 1, S. 1-15
ISSN: 1944-1053
The Impact of Party Cues on Citizen Evaluations of Senators
In: Congress and the presidency: an interdisciplinary journal of political science and history, Band 38, Heft 1, S. 1-16
ISSN: 0734-3469