Public Opinion
In: Nuclear Weapons: Who’s in Charge?, S. 123-134
65 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Nuclear Weapons: Who’s in Charge?, S. 123-134
In: Nuclear Weapons: Who’s in Charge?, S. 73-86
In: Nuclear Weapons: Who’s in Charge?, S. 57-72
In: Nuclear Weapons: Who’s in Charge?, S. 29-43
In: Nuclear Weapons: Who’s in Charge?, S. 11-28
In: Nuclear Weapons: Who’s in Charge?, S. 135-153
The collapse of communism in Eastern Europe, the unification of Germany, the withdrawal of Soviet troops, the possible disintegration of the Soviet Union, disengagement of the United States and creation of a federal Europe - all this has changed the security context in Europe and stimulated a Europe-wide debate about the future. Deep questions about the nature of security itself have been raised. This book will add fuel to the debate
In: Journal for peace and nuclear disarmament, Band 3, Heft 2, S. 366-384
ISSN: 2575-1654
The East Asian peace has lasted since 1979, but regional and global rivalries, unresolved historical grievances, and new nuclear weapons threaten its continuation. In order to reduce these risks, confidence-building measures and crisis management mechanisms are needed. How can the states in Northeast Asia develop such measures, given their high level of mutual distrust? Should confidence-building measures come first, or does confidence-building depend on prior trust-building? This paper explores insights from the academic literature on trust, highlighting the role of trust entrepreneurs, who are willing to open their minds to the possibility of new relationships. Five steps are identified which can lead away from mistrust. The first is to replace enemy images with a recognition of a shared security dilemma. The second is to signal a willingness for change. The third is to persist even when signals are not returned. The fourth is to enter dialogue. The fifth is to pursue steps that embed further cooperation.This approach is applied to confidence-building, trust-building, and security building in Northeast Asia. A pathway forward is sketched, starting with confidence building between the two Koreas, leading on to a peace treaty, a nuclear weapon free zone, and co-operative security arrangements in the region.
BASE
In: Security dialogue, Band 33, Heft 2, S. 193-208
ISSN: 1460-3640
Estonia's success in averting a potential conflict over its Russian-speaking minority is often attributed to the intervention of the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities. Indeed, the Estonian case is one of the most satisfactory encounters in the period of Max van der Stoel's impressive diplomatic engagement. However, deeper, structural factors were also important over the longer term. In particular, the voting system that Estonia adopted, based on the single transferable vote system of proportional representation, turned out to be important in encouraging political moderation. This article argues that a decisive factor in ethnic accommodation was the way the political system channelled the activities of the Russian-speaking groups into Estonian parties. Other contributory factors were the weakness of ethnic identity among the Russian-speakers and international constraints on Russian foreign policy. This analysis highlights the crucial role of domestic institutions in conflict prevention.
In: Security dialogue, Band 33, Heft 2, S. 193-208
ISSN: 0967-0106
In: Études internationales: revue trimestrielle, Band 28, Heft 3, S. 651-652
ISSN: 0014-2123