Still under Rousseau's Spell?
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 115
ISSN: 0017-257X
84 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 115
ISSN: 0017-257X
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 115-119
ISSN: 1477-7053
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 20, Heft 3, S. 287-296
ISSN: 1477-7053
'CRISIS? WHAT CRISIS?', THE CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER was reported to have replied to a question concerning the alleged crisis in sterling. In the case of the welfare state it might seem that the appropriate response would be 'Which crisis? ' since there are several on the menu - fiscal crisis, legitimacy crisis, crisis of ungovernability . Left, Right and Centre have become convinced that there is a crisis. This is after a period of history which had seen an unprecedented rise in the standard of living of the vast majority of the population living in what are normally regarded as welfare states.
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 20, Heft 3, S. 287-296
ISSN: 0017-257X
The welfare state in the UK & elsewhere is currently caught up in a number of crises. The slowing of economic growth has reduced the resources available for its support & has consequently exposed it to theoretical challenges. In particular, it has been criticized as seeking to fulfill needs that are in fact illimitable. In addition, market & liberation theorists have suggested that the welfare state is hostile to individual autonomy & responsibility, & serves the interests of welfare professionals more than those of the poor. It appears, however, that fundamental changes in policy are less likely than incremental readjustments. The issues raised by this crisis concern the basic nature of the relation of society to state, & of both to the individual. W. H. Stoddard
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 18, Heft 2, S. 244-248
ISSN: 1477-7053
In: History of European ideas, Band 4, Heft 4, S. 474-475
ISSN: 0191-6599
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 18, Heft 2, S. 244-248
ISSN: 0017-257X
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 493-498
ISSN: 1477-7053
In: British journal of political science, Band 12, Heft 4, S. 399-419
ISSN: 1469-2112
Liberals have regularly associated tradition with constraint. They have spoken of the 'force' of tradition or of the 'despotism' of custom. Locke drew a contrast between those who let themselves be guided by 'traditional customs and the fashion of the country' and those who use their liberty to think for themselves. For John Stuart Mill 'the love of liberty' was antagonistic to 'the sway of Custom'. Tradition and custom are represented by liberals in much the way Machiavelli represented fortuna, as forces which, unless repulsed by independent, free-thinking persons, would inevitably dominate whole societies and epochs. Mill held up China as the warning example. Custom had there become the court of ultimate appeal, the standard of justice, the argument which none could contemplate resisting. Custom had annihilated individuality and with it liberty, along with genuine history. The consequence was 'stationariness'. Unless the modern pressure of opinion was resisted Europe would become another China. The chief interest of the history of mankind, Mill declared, was the contest between custom and the progressive principle. A free society is in liberal terms an open society.
In: History of European ideas, Band 3, Heft 4, S. 403-414
ISSN: 0191-6599
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 16, Heft 4, S. 495-501
ISSN: 1477-7053
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 249-254
ISSN: 1477-7053
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 249-254
ISSN: 0017-257X
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 249-254
ISSN: 0017-257X
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 223-234
ISSN: 1477-7053