Suchergebnisse

This study looks at the structural and rhetorical changes in the state of the union address from George Washington to Bill Clinton. The author finds that beginning with early‐twentieth‐century presidents, the length of address drops significantly and the president increasingly attempts to identify himself as one of the public in the speech. Among other things, the findings suggest three distinct periods in the evolution of the state of the union address: a founding period, a traditional period, and a modern period. However, although early‐twentieth‐century presidencies may exhibit change in delivery and style of the state of the union address, it is unclear whether this can be credited to a specific modern rhetorical innovation or whether the traditional/modern paradigm may necessitate reevaluation.

Combined international and domestic issues, such as trade policies. Focuses on presidential initiatives involving the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 and the Trade Act of 1970.

Cover -- Half Title Page -- Title Page -- Copyright -- About the Editors -- Contributors -- Preface -- Contents -- Part I. Introduction and Methods -- 1. Text Analysis for Psychology: Methods, Principles, and Practices -- Part II. Dyadic Synchrony/Psychological Coordination in Conversations -- 2. Language Coordination in Writing and Conversation -- 3. Language in Close Relationships -- 4. Harnessing a Language Analysis Perspective to Uncover Emergent Group Processes -- 5. Cooperation, Interaction, Search: Computational Approaches to the Psychology of Asking and Answering Questions -- Part III. Political Psychology -- 6. Language Analysis in Political Psychology -- 7. Automated Integrative Complexity: Language Analysis Tools for Psychological Research -- 8. Text as Data in Political Psychology -- Part IV. Morality -- 9. Language Analysis in Moral Psychology -- 10. Morality in Politics -- 11. Morality in Language -- Part V. Deception/Lying -- 12. Motivation for Deception -- 13. Lies and Language: A Context‑Contingent Approach to Verbal Cues of Deceit -- 14. Deception and Its Detection -- Part VI. Personality and Individual Differences -- 15. Investigating Individual Differences in Metaphor Use and Its Outcomes: Research Questions, Measurement, and Findings -- 16. The Quantum Self: Examining Methodologies to Understand How Language Impacts Bilinguals' Dual Selves -- 17. Personality Disorder and Verbal Behavior -- Part VII. Affect/Sentiment -- 18. Behavioral Machine Intelligence with Language -- 19. Theory‑Driven Measurement of Emotion (Expressions) in Social Media Text -- 20. Identifying and Understanding the Targets of Sentiment Analysis -- Part VIII. Public Health and Well‑Being -- 21. The Language of Environmentalism: Harnessing Social Media Data in the Face of Environmental Uncertainty.

This study explores how team core self-evaluations (CSE) influence the emergence and effectiveness of shared leadership. Drawing on adaptive leadership theory, we propose that decisions to share leadership responsibilities rather than allocating the role to a single team member are influenced by homogeneity in members' CSE. In addition, we identify team collective identification as an emergent team state that interacts with CSE homogeneity to promote the emergence of shared leadership. We then argue that not all shared leadership teams are equally effective; applying group social capital theory, we propose that team mean CSE strengthens the impact of shared leadership on team performance. Results based on multisource and time-lagged data from 85 project teams provide support for our proposed moderated mediation model. We discuss how our theoretical model extends research on the role of team dispositional composition on the antecedents and consequents of shared leadership and highlight practical implications related to the design, recruitment, and socialization of autonomous work teams.

This article analyzes opinions about abortion, racial, and social welfare policies, comparing their determinants among citizens with different levels of political information over the past several decades. Hypothesizing that growing elite partisan polarization may have exacerbated the political implications of differences in political awareness, the authors examine how increasing clarity of party -- policy linkages among political elites influences party -- policy linkages in the mass public. The results show that only the well informed responded to the growing elite polarization by becoming more partisan in their opinions. Apparently, in the absence of the motivation to develop coherent opinions, even a simplification of the political environment does not close the gaps between those who are more and less aware about politics. Adapted from the source document.