Report of the Tresurer, 1982-83
In: PS, Band 16, Heft 4, S. 816-824
ISSN: 2325-7172
93 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: PS, Band 16, Heft 4, S. 816-824
ISSN: 2325-7172
In: Policy sciences: integrating knowledge and practice to advance human dignity ; the journal of the Society of Policy Scientists, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 1
ISSN: 0032-2687
In: American political science review, Band 76, Heft 4, S. 993-993
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: Political science quarterly: a nonpartisan journal devoted to the study and analysis of government, politics and international affairs ; PSQ, Band 97, Heft 3, S. 496-497
ISSN: 1538-165X
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 15, Heft 4, S. 698-705
ISSN: 1537-5935
In: PS, Band 15, Heft 4, S. 698-705
ISSN: 2325-7172
In: Public budgeting & finance, Band 1, Heft 4, S. 56-67
ISSN: 1540-5850
In: Public budgeting & finance, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 3-4
ISSN: 1540-5850
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 14, Heft 4, S. 748-751
ISSN: 1537-5935
Reconciliation forces Congress to consider issues in redistributive terms and alters traditional roles and relationships, but this legislative technique may be short-lived.The 1981 battle of the budget might leave a deeper imprint on legislative behavior than on federal programs and expenditures. The process that produced the omnibus reconciliation bill was extraordinary in its scope and in its integration of diverse legislative activities. More than 30 House and Senate committees were drawn into the reconciliation process and more than half of the Members of Congress participated in the conferences that resulted in the reconciliation decision. The outcome was not a perfectly consistent set of budget decisions, but for a legislature that thrives on the dispersion of power, reconciliation demanded much more cohesion and coordination than Congress normally achieves.It is too early to determine whether reconciliation will become a permanent feature of the congressional budget process or whether it will be applied as extensively in the future as it was in 1981. If it were confined to a few committees and only changed the budget at the margins, reconciliation might not affect basic legislative roles and relationships. But if it continues to demand the active cooperation of numerous committees and tries to change major parts of the budget, reconciliation would certainly lead to a redistribution of legislative power.
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 38, Heft 6, S. 513
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 38, Heft 2, S. 177
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 37, Heft 5, S. 533
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: American political science review, Band 71, Heft 2, S. 731-732
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 37, Heft 3, S. 258
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: American political science review, Band 70, Heft 4, S. 1313-1315
ISSN: 1537-5943